¿Qué tan elementales son los cuatro elementos? Una lectura de Ario Dídimo fr. 21 Diels

Authors

  • Ricardo Salles UFRGS, Dep. of Philosophy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v9i2p1-33

Keywords:

Stoics, physics, physical elements, body, elementos, cuerpo, física del estoicismo

Abstract

[How elemental are the four elements? A reading of Arius Didymus fr. 21 Diels]

Arius Didymus fr. 21 Diels is perhaps the single most important source that we have on Stoic elemental theory. The fragment, however, is obscure in many respects and there is no consensus among scholars on how to interpret its central theses. One important question is what are exactly the three senses of the term ‘element’ alluded to in the text. In the currently most important study of the fragment, John Cooper’s ‘Chrysippus on Physical Elements’, Cooper has argued that two of these senses — the second and the third — refer to bodies that are more basic than the four traditional elements that we know as fire, air, water and earth. In this paper, I take issue with this claim and argue that although there are bodies more basic than the four elements in Stoic physics, such bodies are not referred to, not even implicitly, anywhere in the fragment. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ricardo Salles, UFRGS, Dep. of Philosophy
    Ricardo Salles (BA, Mexico 1990; MPhil and PhD King's College London (1993 and 1997) is a researcher at the Institute of Philosophical Research of the UNAM since 1997. He was a fellow of Harvard?s Center for Hellenic Studies in Washington DC (2003-2004) and a member of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton (2010-2011). He also was the director of the journal Diánoia (issues 58-65), the director of Philosophy Postgraduate Studies at the UNAM (May 2007-August 2010) and the coordinator of the Greek Philosophical Texts Reading Group of the UNAM since 1997. His research work has centered on ancient philosophy and especially on metaphysics and ethics in Aristotle and the Stoics.

References

Ademollo 2012 : “The Platonic origins of Stoic theology", Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43 (2012): 216-243. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199666164.003.0008

Bénatouïl 2002 : T. Bénatouïl, “Logos et scala naturae dans le stoïcisme de Zénon et Cléanthe", Elenchos 23.2 (2002): 297-331.

Boeri-Salles 2014: R. Salles, M.D. Boeri, Los Filósofos Estoicos. Ontología, Lógica, Física y Ética. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag: 2014.

Bréhier 1951: E. Bréhier, Chrysippe et l’Ancien Stoïcisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1951 (2nd. ed.)

Diels 1899: H. Diels, Elementum: eine Vorarbeit zum griechischen und lateinischen Thesaurus, Leipzig, Teubner, 1899.

Cooper 2004 : J. M. Cooper, “Two notes on Aristotle on mixture" en J. M. Cooper, Knowledge, Nature and the Good. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004. doi: 10.1515/9781400826445.148

Cooper 2009: J. M. Cooper, “Chrysippus on physical elements” en R. Salles (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556144.003.0005

Crowley 2005: T. Crowley, “On the Use of Stoicheion in the Sense of ‘Element’", in Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29 (2005): 367-94.

Crowley 2008: T. Crowley, ‘Aristotle’s ‘so-called elements", Phronesis 53 (2008): 233-242. doi: 10.1163/156852808x307061

Crowley 2013: T. Crowley, "De Gen. et Cor. II.3: Does Aristotle Identify the Contraries as Elements?", Classical Quarterly 63.1 (2013): 161-182. doi: 10.1017/s0009838812000584

Dorandi 2013: T. Dorandi, Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Frede 2005: M. Frede, “Sur la théologie stoïcienne” in G. Romeyer-Dherbey, J. B. Gourinat (eds.), Les Stoïciens. Paris: Vrin, 2005: 213-232.

Gould 1970: J. Gould, The Philosophy of Chrysippus. Leiden: Brill, 1970.

Gourinat 2009: J.B. Gourinat “The Stoics on Matter and Primer Matter: ‘Corporealism’ and the Imprint of Plato’s Timaeus” en R. Salles (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556144.003.0003

Kahn 1960: C.H. Kahn, Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology. New York: Columbia University Press, 1960.

Lapidge 1973: M. Lapidge, “Archai and stoicheia: a problem in Stoic cosmology”, Phronesis 18 (1973):240-278. doi: 10.1163/156852873x00177

Long-Sedley 1987: A.A. Long & D.N. Sedley (eds.), The Hellenistic Philosophers. Dos tomos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781139165907

Salles 2005: R. Salles, “Ekpúrosis and the Goodness of God in Cleanthes”, Phronesis 50 (2005): 56-78.

Salles 2009: R. Salles, “Chrysippus on conflagration and the indestructibility of the cosmos” en R. Salles (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. doi: 10.1163/1568528053066960

Salles 2015: R. Salles, “Two early Stoic theories of cosmogony” in A. Marmodoro, B. Prince (eds.), Causation and Creation in Late Antiquity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014: 11-30. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781107447974.003

Salles en prensa 1: R. Salles, “The matter of combustion in the physics of Chrysippus”.

Downloads

Published

2015-10-26

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Salles, R. (2015). ¿Qué tan elementales son los cuatro elementos? Una lectura de Ario Dídimo fr. 21 Diels. Journal of Ancient Philosophy, 9(2), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v9i2p1-33