Aristotle on Non-Contradiction: Philosophers vs. Non-Philosophers

Authors

  • Jean-Louis Hudry USP, Dep. of Philosophy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v7i2p51-74

Keywords:

ancient philosophy, logic, Aristotle, PNC, non-contradiction

Abstract

Aristotle’s principle of non-contradiction (PNC) has been interpreted by Łukasiewicz through three distinct formulations, namely ontological, logical, and psychological. Many have criticized Łukasiewicz’s position, but they still maintain that Aristotle defends distinct formulations. In contrast, this paper shows that Aristotle suggests only one formulation of the PNC. This unique formulation belongs to philosophy as the first science, so that the philosophers think of the PNC as a necessarily true principle, owing to their meta-physical cognition of the nature of things. Yet, there is another way to understand this formulation. Indeed, the non-philosophers believe in the PNC, without being able to understand its necessary truth, due to their ignorance of philosophy. Thus, Aristotle has to convince them that the PNC is the most certain opinion of all, and his dialectical justifications are purposely weak, as they are only concerned with the defense of a common opinion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Jean-Louis Hudry, USP, Dep. of Philosophy
    Jean-Louis Hudry obtained his PhD in philosophy at the University of Edinburgh (UK) in 2006, after a MA in history and philosophy of science at Indiana University (Bloomington, USA) and a Maîtrise in philosophy at the University of Paris-Sorbonne (France). His main research interests are in ancient philosophy, philosophy of science and philosophy of logic. Jean-Louis is now researcher in Ancient Philosophy in São Paulo, Brazil.

References

Barnes, J. 1969. ‘The Law of Contradiction’. Philosophical Quarterly 19: 302-309.

Code, A. 1986. ‘Aristotle’s Investigation of a Basic Logical Principle’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16: 341-358.

Cohen, S. M. 1986. ‘Aristotle on the Principle of Non-Contradiction’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16: 359-370.

Dancy, R. M. 1975 Sense and Contradiction. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Ferejohn, M. 1991. The Origins of Aristotelian Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Gottlieb, P. 1994. ‘The Principle of non-Contradiction and Protagoras: The Strategy of Aristotle’s Metaphysics IV 4’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Philosophy Vol. VIII: 183-198.

Hamlyn, D. W. 1990. ‘Aristotle on Dialectic’. Philosophy 65: 465-476.

Hudry, J.-L. 2009. ‘Aristotle on Time, Plurality and Continuity’, Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 12: 190-205.

Hudry, J.-L. 2011. ‘Aristotle on Meaning’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93: 253-280.

Irwin, T. H. 1977. ‘Aristotle's Discovery of Metaphysics’, The Review of Metaphysics 31: 210-229.

Kirwan, C. 1993. Aristotle’s Metaphysics: Books Gamma, Delta, and Epsilon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kretzmann, N. 1974. ‘Aristotle on Spoken Sounds Significant by Convention’. In: J. Corcoran (ed.). Ancient Logic and its Modern Interpretation. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Lear, J. 1980. Aristotle and Logical Theory. London: Cambridge University Press.

Łukasiewicz, J. 1910/1979. ‘Aristotle on the Law of Contradiction’. In: J. Barnes, M. Schofield, and R. Sorabji (eds.)Articles on Aristotle. Vol. 3: Metaphysics. London:

Duckworth.

Łukasiewicz, J. 1920/1958. Aristotle’s Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

McKirahan, R. D. 1992. Principles and Proofs: Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstrative Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Politis, V. 2004. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Aristotle and the Metaphysics. London and New York: Routledge.

Priest, G. 1998. ‘To be and not to be—that is the answer. On Aristotle and the Law of Non-Contradiction’. Philosophiegeschichte und Logische Analyse 1: 91-130.

Priest, G. 2006. Doubt Truth to be a Liar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ross, W. D. 1924. Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Smith, R. 1989. Aristotle: Prior Analytics. Indianapolis: Hackett.

Upton, T. V. 1983. ‘Psychological and Metaphysical Dimensions of Non-Contradiction in Aristotle’. The Review of Metaphysics 36: 591-606.

Vlastos, G. 1999. ‘The Socratic Elenchus’. G. Fine (ed.) In Metaphysics and Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Wedin, M. 2000. ‘Some Logical Problems in Metaphysics Gamma’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 19: 113-62.

Wedin, M. 2004a. ‘Aristotle on the Firmness of the Principle of Non-Contradiction’. Phronesis 49: 225-265.

Wedin, M. 2004b. ‘On the Use and Abuse of Non-Contradiction: Aristotle’s Critique of Protagoras and Heraclitus in Metaphysics Gamma 5’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26: 213-239.

Whitaker, C. W. A. 1996. Aristotle's De Interpretatione: Contradiction and Dialectic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Wians, W. 2006. ‘The Philosopher’s Knowledge of Non-Contradiction’. Ancient bPhilosophy 26: 333-353.

Downloads

Published

2013-11-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hudry, J.-L. (2013). Aristotle on Non-Contradiction: Philosophers vs. Non-Philosophers. Journal of Ancient Philosophy, 7(2), 51-74. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v7i2p51-74