Vulnerability in adolescence: a case report of attempted abortion and sexual violence
ResumoBackground: Abortion, even when provided by law in cases of sexual violence, continues to be practiced in an insecure way, since women who suffer violence are not reported or guarded by social, institutional or age vulnerability, as in adolescence. Objective: Describe the clinical consequences of unsafe abortion, report this experience as well as sexual violence in situations of social and age vulnerability. Methods: It is a clinical case report, with the consent of the patient, in the year 2016, of a 16-year-old female adolescent with a personal history of sexual violence by an intimate aggressor. Admitted to the health service with diagnosis of acute abdomen and induced abortion using antibiotic therapy. Results: Laboratory tests revealed altered C reactive protein and presence of leukocytosis, ultrasound showed heterogenic mass, computed tomography showed presence of cylindrical foreign body in vaginal cavity, surgical interventions, sepsis, clinical complications (pulmonary thromboembolism) and prolonged hospitalization. Conclusion: The history of violence portrayed in this study reveals an attempt of abortion with self harm, revealing negative clinical repercussions and the health problems of the adolescent. This person has committed an abortion that does not fit into the abortion criteria provided by law. It also revealed the need for further discussion on the topic, highlighting health promotion practices against unsafe abortion.
World Health Organization (WHO). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. [cited 2016 Dec 10] Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85239/1/9789241564625_eng.pdf.
García-Moreno C, Zimmerman C, Morris-Gehring A, Heise L, Amin A, Abrahams N, et al. Addressing violence against women: a call to action. Lancet. 2015;385(9978):1685-95. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61830-4
Saultes TA, Devita D, Heiner JD. The Back Alley Revised: Sepsis after attempted Self-Induced Abortion. West J Emerg Med. 2009;10(4):278-80.
Nayak PK, Mitra S, Padma A, Agrawal S. Late presentation of unsafe abortion after 5 years of procedure. Case Reports Obstetr Gynecol. 2014;(2014). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/456017
Blake MT, Drezett J, Machi GS, Pereira VX, Raimundo RD, Oliveira FR, et al. Factors associated with the delay in seeking legal abortion for pregnancy resulting from rape. Int Arch Med. 2015;8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3823/1628
Sreelakshmi U, Thejaswini J, Bharathi T. The outcome of septic abortion: a tertiary care hospital experience. J Obstetr Ginaecol Índia. 2014;64(4):265-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0509-4
Azevedo WF, Diniz MB, Fonseca ES, Azevedo LM, Evangelista CB, et al. Complications in adolescent pregnancy: systematic review of the literature. Einstein (São Paulo). 2015;13(4):618-26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082015RW3127
Kind L, Orsini MLP, Nepomuceno V, Gonçalves L, Souza GA, Ferreira MFF. Primary healthcare and underreporting and (in)visibility of violence against women. Cad Saúde Pública. 2013;29(9):1805-15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00096312
Sama CB, Aminde LN, Angwafo FF. Clandestine abortion causing uterine perforation and bowel infarction in a rural area: a case report and brief review. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9:98. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1926-5
Sorpreso ICE, Soares Junior JM, Baracat EC. Sexually vulnerable women: could reversible long-lasting contraception be the solution? Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2015;37(9):395-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/SO100-720320150005456
Mattos IA, Lima IMSO. Motherhood and intrafamilial child sexual abuse: to guarante a protective embrace. J Hum Growth Dev. 2012;22(3):373-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.46709
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas. Linha de cuidado para a atenção integral à saúde de crianças, adolescentes e suas famílias em situações de violências. [cited 2016 Ouc 15] Available from: http://www.ensp.fiocruz.br/portalensp/consultapublica/arquivos/1393133501.pdf
Grimes DA, Benson J, Singh S, Romero M, Ganatra B, Okonofua FE, et al. Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic. Lancet. 2006;368(9550):1908-19. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69481-6
Jina R, Thomas LS. Health consequences of sexual violence against women. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(1):15-26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.08.012
Diniz D, Medeiros M. Abortion in Brazil: a household survey using the ballot Box technique. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2010;15(supl. 1):959-66. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232010000700002
Figueiredo R, Bastos S, Telles L J. Perfil da distribuição da contracepção de emergência para adolescentes em municípios do Estado de São Paulo. J Hum Growth Dev. 2012; 22(1):105-15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.20058
Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS). Abortamento seguro: orientação técnica e de políticas para sistemas de saúde. 2 ed. 2013. [cited 2016 Dec 10] Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/70914/7/9789248548437_por.pdf
Brasil. Câmara dos Deputados. Decreto n.º 2848/40, de 07 de dezembro de 1940. Código Penal Art. 124-128. [cited 2016 Dec 10] Available from: https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/topicos/10624811/artigo-128-do-decreto-lei-n-2848-de-07-de-dezembro-de-1940.
Silva SA, Lucena KDT, Deininger LSC, Coelho HFC, Vianna RPT, Anjos UU. Analysis of Domestic Violence on Women’s Health. J Hum Growth Dev. 2015;25(2):182-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.103009.
McCloskey LA. The Effects of gender-based violence on women’s unwanted pregnancy and abortion. Yale J Biol Med. 2016;89(2):153-9.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Política Nacional de Atenção Integral à Saúde da Mulher: princípios e diretrizes. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde. 2011.
Chalem E, Mitsuhiro SS, Ferri CP, Barros MCM, Guinsburg R, Laranjeira R. Teenager pregnancy: behavioral and socio-demographic profile of an urban Brazilian population. Cad Saúde Pública. 2007;23(1):177-86. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2007000100019
Milanez N, Oliveira AE, Barroso ADV, Martinelli KG, Esposti CDD, Santos Neto ET. Unwanted pregnancy and abortion attempt: practices and contexts. Sex Salud Soc. 2016;(22):129-46. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1984-6487.sess.2016.22.06.a
Heilborn ML. Heterossexualidades, contracepção e aborto: Uma pesquisa em quatro capitais latino-americanas. Sex Salud Soc. 2012;(12):127-34. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-64872012000600006
Pallitto CC, García-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Heise L, Ellsberg M, Watts C, et al. Intimate partner violence, abortion, and unintended pregnancy: results from the WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;120(1):3-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.07.003
Lukasse M, Laanpere M, Karro H, Kristjansdottir H, Schroll AM, Van Parys AS, et al. Pregnancy intendedness and the association with physical, sexual and emotional abuse - a European multi-country cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15:120. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0558-4
Henderson JT1, Puri M, Blum M, Harper CC, Rana A, Gurung G, et al. Effects of abortion legalization in Nepal, 2001-2010. Plos One. 2013;8(5):e64775. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064775
Rocca CH, Puri M, Dulal B, Bajracharya L, Harper CC, Blum M, et al. Unsafe abortion after legalisation in Nepal: a cross-sectional study of women presenting to hospitals. BJOG. 2013;120(9):1075-83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12242
Ogland CP, Verona AP. Religion and attitudes toward abortion and abortion policy in Brazil. J Sci Study Relig. 2011;50(4):812-21.
Noll JG, Trickett PK, Long JD, Negriff S, Susman EJ, Shalev I, et al. Childhood sexual abuse and early timing of puberty. J Adolescent Health. 2016;60(1):65-71. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.09.008
Bezerra IMP, Sorpreso ICE. Concepts and movements in health promotion to guide educational practices. J Hum Growth Dev. 2016;26(1):11-20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.113709
Rocha MIB. A discussão política sobre aborto no Brasil: uma síntese. Rev Bras Est Pop. 2006;23(2):369-74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-30982006000200011
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis