Validade e reprodutibilidade de um questionário de frequência alimentar para crianças
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.147217Palavras-chave:
consumo de alimentos, criança, questionários, validade dos testes, reprodutibilidade dos testes, avaliação nutricional.Resumo
Introdução: Um Questionário de Frequência Alimentar Quantitativo (QUEFAC) foi construído por Hinnig et al. para avaliar a dieta habitual de crianças de 7 a 10 anos, uma vez que os desenvolvidos para adultos podem superestimar o consumo de crianças. Porém, precisa ser testado quanto sua validade e reprodutibilidade para se afirmar que o instrumento apresenta qualidade reconhecida.
Objetivo: Avaliar a reprodutibilidade e a validade do QUEFAC em crianças de 7 a 10 anos.
Método: A reprodutibilidade foi realizada com 89 crianças que responderam a dois QUEFAC’s. A validade foi realizada com 167 crianças que responderam a três Recordatórios de 24 horas (método de referência) e a um QUEFAC. Para avaliação, utilizaram-se o teste t pareado e Wilcoxon, os coeficientes de correlação intraclasse e Kappa ponderado e análise dos gráficos de Bland-Altman.
Resultados: Para reprodutibilidade, observou-se diferença de médias para todos os nutrientes investigados, os coeficientes de correlação variaram de 0,12 a 0,54 e os valores de Kappa de 0,01 a 0,39. Na validade, observou-se diferença de média para todos os nutrientes, com exceção da energia e zinco, os coeficientes de correlação variaram de 0 a 0,37, valores de Kappa de 0 a 0,27 e gráficos de Bland-Altman mostraram distribuição aleatória para a maioria dos nutrientes investigados.
Conclusão: O QUEFAC não se mostrou válido para avaliação da dieta habitual dos últimos três meses em crianças de 7 a 10 anos em São Paulo e apresentou moderada reprodutibilidade para energia, proteínas, cálcio, fósforo, ferro, potássio, magnésio e vitamina B2.
Referências
Rockett HR, Wolf AM, Colditz GA. Development and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire to assess diets of older children and adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995;95(3):336-40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(95)00086-0
Biró G, Hulshof KF, Ovesen L, Amorim Cruz JA; EFCOSUM Group. Selection of methodology to assess food intake. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002;56 (Suppl 2):S25-32. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601426
Arnold JE, Rohan T, Howe G, Leblanc M. Reproducibility and validity of a food frequency questionnaire designed for use in girls age 7 to 12 years. Ann Epidemiol.1995;5(5):369-77. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1047-2797(95)00034-5
Kobayashi T, Kamimura M, Imai S, Toji C, Okamoto N, Fukui M, et al. Reproducibility and validity of the food frequency questionnaire for estimating habitual dietary intake in children and adolescents. Nutr J. 2011;10:27. DOI: ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-10-27
Preston AM, Palacios C, Rodríguez CA, Vélez-Rodríguez RM. Validation and Reproducibility of a Semi-Quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire for Use in Puerto Rican Children. P R Health Sci J. 2011;30(2):58-64.
Scagliusi FB, Garcia MT, Indiani ALC, Cardoso MA. Relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire developed to assess food intake of schoolchildren living in the Brazilian Western Amazon. Cad Saude Publica. 2011;27(11):2197-206. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2011001100013
Matos SM, Prado MS, Santos CA, D'Innocenzo S, Assis AM, Dourado LS, et al. Validation of a food frequency questionnaire for children and adolescents aged 4 to 11 years living in Salvador, Bahia. Nutr Hosp. 2012; 27(4):1114-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3305/nh.2012.27.4.5883
Willett WC. Nutritional Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Hinnig PF, Mariath AB, Freaza SEM, Gambardella AMD, Bergamaschi DP. Construção de um Questionário de Frequência Alimentar Quantitativo para crianças de 7 a 10 anos. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2014;17(2):479-94. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4503201400020015ENG
Machin D, Campbell M, Fayers P, Pinol A. Sample size table for clinical studies. 2ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1997.
Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa (ABEP). Critério Padrão de Classificação Econômica/Brasil. 2008. [cited 2011 Nov 25] Available from: file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/CCEB%202008%20%20Em%20vigor%20em%202008%20(base%20LSE%202005).pdf
Zabotto CB, Vianna RPT, Gil MF. Registro fotográfico para inquéritos dietéticos: utensílios e porções. Goiânia: Nepa/Unicamp; 1996.
Willett W, Stamfer MJ. Total energy intake: implications for epidemiological analyses. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;124(1):17-27.
Watson JF, Collins CE, Sibbritt DW, Dibley MJ, Garg ML. Reproducibility and comparative validity of a food frequency questionnaire for Australian children and adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009; 6:62. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-6-62
Block G. A review of validations of dietary assessment methods. Am J Epidemiol. 1982;115(4):492-505. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113331
Romieu I, Stampfer MJ, Stryker WS, Hernadez M, Kaplan L, Sober A, et al. Food predictors of betacarotene and alpha- tocopherol: validation of a food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;131(5):864-76.
Gibson, RS. Principles of Nutritional Assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
Nelson M. The validation of dietary questionnaires. In: Margetts BM, Nelson M. Design Concepts in Nutritional Epidemiology. 2.ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
McPherson RS, Hoelscher DM, Alexander M, Scanlon KS, Serdula MK. Dietary assessment methods among school-aged children: validity and reliability. Prev Med. 2000;31(2):S11-33. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2000.0631
Beaton GH. Interpretation of results from diet history studies. In: Kohlmeier L. The Diet History Method. Proceedings of the 2nd Berlin Meeting on Nutritional Epidemiology. London: Smith-Gordon; 1989.
Rockett HR, Colditz GA. Assessing diets of children and adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65(4 Supl):S1116-22. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/ajcn/65.4.1116S
Serdula MK, Alexander MP, Scanlon KS, Bowman BA. What are preschool children eating? A review of dietary assessment. Annu Rev Nutr. 2001;21:475-98. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev.nutr.21.1.475
Sahashi Y, Tsuji M, Wada K, Tamai Y, Nakamura K, Nagata C. Validity and reproducibility of food frequency questionnaire in Japanese children aged 6 years. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 2011;57(5):372-6.
Livingstone MB, Robson PJ. Measurement of dietary intake in children. Proc Nutr Soc. 2000;59(2):279-93. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0029665100000318
Subar AF, Dodd KW, Guenther PM, Kipnis V, Midthune D, McDowell M, et al. The food propensity questionnaire: concept, development, and validation for use as a covariate in a model to estimate usual food intake. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106(1):1556-63. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2006.07.002
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
