Difference and Advantage of the Skeptical Seduction

Authors

  • Cesar Kiraly Universidade Federal Fluminense, UFF

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.2020.171563

Keywords:

Skepticism, Politics, Ethics

Abstract

The essay aims to present the paths of an approach, skeptical of politics and its mechanisms of seduction, as well as its unpredictability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Annas, J. (1983). The Morality of Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aubenque. (1973). “As Filosofias Helenísticas: estoicismo, epicurismo e ceticismo.” In: A Filosofia Pagã. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
Barnes, J. (1998). “The Beliefs of a Pyrrhonist.” In: The Original Sceptics: a controversy. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
Barthes, R. (2003). O Neutro. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
Bernhard, T. (2011). “Montaigne: uma narrativa”, Serrote (7), pp. 231-238.
Bicca, L. (2012). “Ceticismo como Terapia.” In: Ceticismo e Relativismo. Rio de Janeiro: 7Letras.
Burnyeat, M. (1998). “Can the Sceptic Live his Scepticism?” In: The Original Sceptics: a controversy. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
Empiricus, S. (2006). Against Ethicists. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Laursen, J. C. (2004). “Yes, Skeptics Can Live Their Skepticism and Cope with Tyranny as Well Anyone.” In: Skepticism in Renaissance and Post-Renaissance Thought. New York: Humanity Books.
Smith, P. J. (2007). “Terapia e Vida Comum. ” Sképsis 1(1).

Published

2020-06-28

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Kiraly, C. (2020). Difference and Advantage of the Skeptical Seduction. Discurso, 50(1), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.2020.171563