Uma leitura do problema da divisão do trabalho em Smith

Authors

  • Claude Gautier École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
  • Thiago Vargas Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.2022.206610

Keywords:

division of labour, Adam Smith, liberalism, Wealth of Nations, exchange

Abstract

By revisiting the problem of Smith's division of labour, starting from the two discourses on the issue developed in Books I and V of The Wealth of Nations, this paper aims to analyze this very notion from the perspective of Smith’s naturalistic and epistemological considerations as well as to highlight the relational and interdependent aspect present in the division of labour. In so doing, we seek to critically reconsider Smith’s “liberalism”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berkeley, G. (1997). Œuvres I. Ed. G. Bryckman. Paris: PUF. Col. Épiméthée.

Bonay, D.; Cozic, M. (2011). Principe de charité et sciences de l’homme. Disponível em: www.researchgate.net/publication/255654104_Principe_de_charite_et_sciences_de_l’homme_1.

Cropsey, J. (1957). Polity and Economy: An interpretation of the Principles of Adam Smith. Coll. “A Series of Books by American Scholars”, v. 8. Reedição por Springer, 2013. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Delpla, I. (2001). Quine et Davidson. Le principe de charité. Col. Philosophie. Paris: PUF.

Ferguson, A (2013). Essai sur l’histoire de la société civile. Ed. Patrick Vieu. Col. La croisée des chemins. Lyon: Ens-Éditions.

Gautier, C. (2004). “Texte, contexte et intention illocutoire de l’auteur. Les en-jeux du programme méthodologique de Quentin Skinner”. Revue de métaphy-sique et de morale, vol. 2. Paris: PUF, p. 177-192

Gautier, C. (2011). Adam Ferguson An Essay on the History of Civil Society. Nature, histoire et civilisation. Paris: PUF.

Gautier, C. (2020). Voir et connaître la société. Regarder à distance dans les Lumières écossaises. Lyon: ENS-Éditions Lyon. Col. La croisée des chemins.

Haakonssen, K; Winch, D. (2006). “The Legacy of Adam Smith”. In: Haa-konssen, K. (org.). The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 366-395.

Hill, L. (2006). “Adam Smith and the Theme of Corruption”. The Review of Poli-tics, v. 68, nº 4, p. 636-662.

Lamb, R. (1973). “Adam Smith’s Concept of Alienation”. Oxford Economic Papers, v. 25, 2, july, p. 275-285.

Macfie, A. L.; Cropsey, J. (1959). “Polity and Economy: An interpretation of the Principles of Adam Smith”. Philosophical Quaterly, (9) 35.

Meek, R. (2010). Social science and the ignoble savage. [1976]. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.

Skinner, Q. (2002). Visions of Politics. v. 1. Regarding Method. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.

Smith, A. (1976a). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Ed. Campbell; A.S. Skinner. Oxford: Clarendon Press. The Clarendon Edition.

Smith, A. (1976b). Theory of Moral Sentiments. Ed. D. D. Raphaël; A. L. Macfie. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976. The Clarendon Edition.

Smith, A. (1980). “Of the External Senses”. In: Smith, A. Essays on Philosophical Subjects. Ed. Wightman, W.P.D.; Bryce, J. C.; Ross, L. S. Oxford: Clarendon Press. The Clarendon Edition.

Smith, A. (1995). Enquête sur la nature et les causes de la richesse des nations. Trad., ed. P. Taïeb. 4 vol. Paris: PUF.

Smith, A. (2007). Théorie des sentiments moraux. Trad., ed. M. Biziou, C. Gautier, J.-F. Pradeau. Paris: PUF. Col. Quadrige.

Spitz, J.-F. (1989). “Comment lire les textes du passé. Le programme méthodolo-gique de Quentin Skinner”. Revue Droits, 1, p. 133-145.

West, E. G. (1969). “The Political economy of Alienation, Karl Marx and Adam Smith”. Oxford Economic Papers, Mar., New Series, Vol. 21, p. 1-23.

West, E. G. (1975). “Adam Smith and Alienation: A Rejoinder”. Oxford Economic Papers, Jul., New Series, Vol. 27, p. 295-301.

Winch, D. (1978). Adam Smith’s Politics. An essay in historiographic revision. Cam-bridge: Cambridge Univesity Press.

Published

2022-12-30

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Gautier, C. (2022). Uma leitura do problema da divisão do trabalho em Smith (T. Vargas , Trans.). Discurso, 52(2), 190-209. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.2022.206610