Teachers’ attitudes toward exercise typologies in the computer-based university entrance examination

Authors

  • Ana Sevilla-Pavón Universidad de Valencia
  • Ana Gimeno-Sanz Universidad Politécnica de Valencia
  • Jesús García-Laborda Universidad de Alcalá

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-9702201612149283

Keywords:

Teachers’ attitudes, Spanish University Entrance Examination (PAU), Computer-Assisted Testing, English as a Foreign Language, Exercise typology

Abstract

This article stems from research carried out within the Paulex Universitas Project in order to gather relevant information regarding 2nd year baccalaureate professors’ preferences in terms of exercise typology with a view to analysing the feasibility of implementing a computer-based foreign language exam within the University Entrance Examination in Spain and, more specifically, the suitability of exam automation, professors’ preferred exercise typologies and the relationship between them. A total of 214 professors completed a questionnaire, administered in accordance with the Delphi method, enquiring about the typologies they preferred in relation to the language skills to be assessed. Regarding test automation, there was evidence that professors clearly accepted the proposed computer-based language exam. As for exercise typology, professors preferred open answer/input and multiple-choice exercises. With regard to the relationship between exercise typologies, there appears to be no visible marked tendency toward a specific type of task, as it is unclear whether communicative tasks or objective information tasks are preferred. Findings also showed that, despite some reservations, teachers consider computer use an overall good system for exam delivery regardless of the language skill being assessed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Teachers’ attitudes toward exercise typologies in the computer-based university entrance examination. (2017). Educação E Pesquisa, 43(4), 1179-1200. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-9702201612149283