Domains of action of researchers in Education in Brazil

Authors

  • Célia Elizabete Caregnato Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
  • Bernardo Sfredo Miorando Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
  • Denise Leite Global University Network for Innovation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634202248248132por

Keywords:

Educational research, Knowledge production, Domains of action, Scientific field

Abstract

This article outlines areas of action of researchers as tools to interpret for whom the area of Education produces knowledge. It contextualizes the research in Education in Brazil in its peculiar institutional and epistemological conditions. It works with sociological concepts such as scientific field, scientific capitals, and autonomy of the professional field to illuminate aspects of the Brazilian academic context of knowledge production in Education. It associates these concepts with the notions of domain and dialogue with audiences to advance in the interpretation of the contradictions and heteronomies faced by the area. It is grounded on the qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with Brazilian researchers recognized for their academic representativeness with productivity grants and a history of leadership in scientific research. It questions how relationships with different social groups support processes of knowledge production and circulation. To account for this questioning, it characterizes the academic-scientific subfield of Education in terms of specific capitals, research audiences, prestige criteria, and political relations. It discusses strategies of dialogue as instrumental categories to interpret phenomena associated with scientific and political legitimacy. As a result, it finds four domains of action in knowledge production in Education: scientific-disciplinary; pedagogical; political-managerial; dialogical socio-educational. It concludes that, when acting in the different domains, these researchers differently order the priorities conferred to scientific rigor and socio-educational intervention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BARATA, Rita B. et al. The configuration of the Brazilian scientific field. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, Rio de Janeiro, v. 86, n. 1, p. 505-521, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201420130023

» https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201420130023

BEIGEL, Fernanda. The politics of academic autonomy in Latin America. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.

BIGLAN, Anthony. The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, Washington, DC, v. 57, n. 3, p. 195-203, 1973. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232441743_The_Characteristics_of_Subject_Matter_in_Different_Academic_Areas Acesso em: 7 jun. 2022.

» https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232441743_The_Characteristics_of_Subject_Matter_in_Different_Academic_Areas

BOURDIEU, Pierre. Le champ scientifique. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, Paris, v. 2, n. 2-3, p. 88-104, jun. 1976. https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.1976.3454

» https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.1976.3454

BOURDIEU, Pierre. Os usos sociais da ciência: por uma sociologia clínica do campo científico. São Paulo: Unesp, 2004.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. Razões práticas: sobre a teoria da ação. Campinas: Papirus, 1996.

BRENNAN, John et al. Diversity of higher education institutions in networked knowledge societies: a comparative examination. In: HOFFMAN, David M.; VÄLIMAA, Jussi (ed.). Re-becoming universities: higher education institutions in networked knowledge societies. Dordrecht: Springer, 2016. p. 115-139.

BÜHLMANN, Felix et al. Mapping the power of Law professors: the role of scientific and social capital. Minerva, New York, v. 55, n. 4, p. 509-531, dez. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-017-9333-1

» https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-017-9333-1

CAPES. Coordenação para o Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. Diretoria de Avaliação. Área 38 – Educação. Documento de área: área 38: educação. Brasília, DF: Capes, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/capes/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/educacao-doc-area-2-pdf Acesso em: 7 jun. 2022.

» https://www.gov.br/capes/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/educacao-doc-area-2-pdf

CAREGNATO, Célia Elizabete; MAGGI, Noeli R. A educação como campo amplo: demarcações e práticas de pesquisa. In: OLIVEIRA, Rejane P.; CAREGNATO, Célia Elizabete (org.). Pesquisa e conhecimento em instituições universitárias do Rio Grande do Sul: literatura, educação, direito e design. Porto Alegre: UniRitter, 2009. p. 46-70.

CAREGNATO, Célia Elizabete; MIORANDO, Bernardo Sfredo; LEITE, Denise. O campo da educação no Brasil: mudanças em atributos para legitimação dos pesquisadores. Revista Brasileira de Política e Administração da Educação, Brasília, DF, v. 34, n. 1, p. 211-232, jan. /abr. 2018. https://doi.org/10.21573/vol34n12018.73465

» https://doi.org/10.21573/vol34n12018.73465

CHARLOT, Bernard. A pesquisa educacional entre conhecimentos, políticas e práticas: especificidades e desafios de uma área de saber. Revista Brasileira de Educação, Rio de Janeiro, v. 11, n. 31, p. 7-18, jan./abr. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782006000100002

» https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782006000100002

CHYNOWET, Paul. The built environment interdiscipline: a theoretical model for decision makers in research and teaching. Structural Survey, Bingley, v. 27, n. 4, p. 301-310, 2009.

ETZIONI, Amitai. The semi-professions and their organization: teachers, nurses, social workers. New Yorque: Free Press, 1969.

FARIA FILHO, Luciano Mendes de. Avaliação da pós-graduação em educação: questões, dilemas e algumas proposições. Educação em Foco, Belo Horizonte, v. 19, n. 27, p. 173-205, jan./abr. 2016. https://doi.org/10.24934/eef.v19i27.1491

» https://doi.org/10.24934/eef.v19i27.1491

FERNÁNDEZ ENGUITA, Mariano. A ambiguidade da docência: entre o profissionalismo e a proletarização. Teoria e Educação, Porto Alegre, n. 4, p. 41-61, 1991.

RISTOFF, Dilvo; BIANCHETTI, Lucídio. A pós-graduação e suas interlocuções com a educação básica: (des)encontros históricos e manutenção do apartheid socioeducacional. Avaliação, Campinas, v. 17, n. 3, p. 787-824, nov. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-40772012000300010

» https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-40772012000300010

ROSSI, Pedro et al. Austeridade fiscal e o financiamento da educação no Brasil. Educação & Sociedade, Campinas, v. 40, e0223456, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1590/ES0101-73302019223456

» https://doi.org/10.1590/ES0101-73302019223456

SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa. Introdução a uma ciência pós-moderna. Rio de Janeiro: Graal, 1989.

Published

2022-11-22

How to Cite

Domains of action of researchers in Education in Brazil. (2022). Educação E Pesquisa, 48(contínuo), e248132. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634202248248132por