Right to read: what we can learn from neurosciences to augment childhood and literacy policies

Autores/as

  • Stanford University
  • Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634202349249518eng

Palabras clave:

Literacy, Adversity, Toxic stress, Cognitive development, Cumulative disadvantages

Resumen

Early adverse experiences are associated with a diverse range of health and learning issues, and scientific evidence suggests that they might have a long-term impact on the developing brain. Poor socioeconomic conditions also appear to reinforce stress-inducing experiences related to adversity and are connected to a disadvantageous literacy environment. There are indications that these factors play a role in early cognitive gaps in essential literacy skills that might place children in a cumulative disadvantage path in literacy and consequent academic trajectory. This literature review analyzes the effects of early adverse experiences, such as poverty, violence, abuse, neglect, and hunger, on the development of key brain areas and cognitive skills related to reading to propose policies that, following neuroscientific knowledge, can contribute to minimizing the impacts caused by such stressors on the academic trajectory of vulnerable students. Historically in Brazil, the impacts of stressors are vaguely considered in the formulation of education public policies. Understanding how such negative experiences influence neurodevelopment and seeking actions to combat them can be the key to providing healthy cognitive development and guaranteeing children’s right to reading.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

BIEMILLER, Andrew. Relationships between oral reading rates for letters, words, and simple text in the development of reading achievement and reading. Reading Research Quarterly, Newark, v. 13, n. 2, p. 223-253, 1977-1978.

BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Base nacional comum curricular. Brasília, DF: MEC, 2017. Available in: http://basenacionalcomum.mec.gov.br/images/BNCC_EI_EF_110518_versaofinal_site.pdf. Access at: 11 sep. 2020.

» http://basenacionalcomum.mec.gov.br/images/BNCC_EI_EF_110518_versaofinal_site.pdf.

BRITO, Natalie H.; NOBLE, Kimberly G. Socioeconomic status and structural brain development. Frontiers in Neuroscience, Lausanne, v. 8, p. 1-12, 2014.

CARR, Thomas H. Building theories of reading ability: on the relation between individual differences in cognitive skills and reading comprehension. Cognition, Amsterdam, v. 9, n. 1, p. 73-114, 1981.

CUNNINGHAM, Anne E.; STANOVICH, Keith E. Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, Washington, DC, v. 33, n. 6, p. 934-945, 1997.

DEHAENE, Stanislas. Les neurones de la lecture. Paris: Odile Jacob, 2007.

DEHAENE, Stanislas. Os neurônios da leitura: como a ciência explica a nossa capacidade de ler. Tradução Leonor Scliar-Cabral. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2012.

DE SOTO, Janet L.; DE SOTO, Clinton B. Relationship of reading achievement to verbal processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, Washington, DC, v. 75, n. 1, p. 116-127, 1983.

GILLEN, Julia; HALL, Nigel. The emergence of early childhood literacy. In: HALL, Nigel; LARSON, Joanne; MARSH, Jackie (ed.). Handbook of early childhood literacy. London: Sage, 2003. p. 3-12.

JEDNORÓG, Katarzyna et al. How reliable are gray matter disruptions in specific reading disability across multiple countries and languages? Insights from a large-scale voxel-based morphometry study. Human Brain Mapping, New York, v. 36, n. 5, p. 1741-1754, 2015.

JOHNS, Clinton L. et al. Individual differences in decoding skill, print exposure, and cortical structure in young adults. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, London, v. 33, n. 10, p. 1275-1295, 2018.

KUHL, Patricia K. Is speech learning ‘gated’ by the social brain? Developmental Science, Oxford, v. 10, n. 1, p. 110-120, 2007.

KUHL, Patricia K.; TSAO, Feng-Ming; LIU, Huei-Mei. Foreign-language experience in infancy: effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, v. 100, n. 15, p. 9096-9101, 2003.

LONIGAN, Christopher J. et al. Evaluating the components of an emergent literacy intervention for preschool children at risk for reading difficulties. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, New York, v. 114, n. 1, p. 111-130, 2013.

MARTIN, Nicole M. et al. Historical development of literacy research. Hoboken: Wiley, 2012. (The encyclopedia of applied linguistics).

MCLOYD, Vonnie C. Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American Psychologist, Washington, DC, v. 53, n. 2, p. 185-204, 1998.

MINAI, Utako et al. Fetal rhythm-based language discrimination: a biomagnetometry study. NeuroReport, Oxford, v. 28, n. 10, p. 561-564, 2017.

MITCHELL, Don C. The process of reading: a cognitive analysis of fluent reading and learning to read. Chichester: Wiley, 1982.

NATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL ON THE DEVELOPING CHILD. Excessive stress disrupts the architecture of the developing brain: working paper 3. Cambridge: Harvard University, 2005. Available in: https://developingchild.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2005/05/Stress_Disrupts_Architecture_Developing_Brain-1.pdf. Access at: mar. 18, 2019.

» https://developingchild.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2005/05/Stress_Disrupts_Architecture_Developing_Brain-1.pdf.

NOBLE, Kimberly G.; TOTTENHAM, Nim; CASEY, Betty J. Neuroscience perspectives on disparities in school readiness and cognitive achievement. Future of Children, Los Altos, v. 15, n. 1, p. 71-89, 2005.

NOBLE, Kimberly G. et al. Brain-behavior relationships in reading acquisition are modulated by socioeconomic factors. Developmental Science, Oxford, v. 9, n. 6, p. 642-654, 2006. Available in: https://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00542.x. Access at: apr. 23, 2022.

NOBLE, Kimberly G. et al. Higher education is an age-independent predictor of white matter integrity and cognitive control in late adolescence. Developmental Science, Oxford, v. 16, n. 5, p. 653-664, 2013.

NOBLE, Kimberly G. et al. Hippocampal volume varies with educational attainment across the life-span. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Lausanne, v. 6, p. 1-10, 2012a.

NOBLE, Kimberly G. et al. Neural correlates of socioeconomic status in the developing human brain. Developmental Science, Oxford, v. 15, n. 4, p. 516-527, 2012b.

NORTHROP, Laura. Breaking the cycle: cumulative disadvantage in literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, , v. 52, n. 4, p. 391-396, 2017.

PAVLAKIS, Alexandra E. et al. Brain imaging and electrophysiology biomarkers: is there a role in poverty and education outcome research? Pediatric Neurology, Chippewa Falls, v. 52, n. 4, p. 383-388, 2015.

SHARE, David L. et al. Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, Washington, DC, v. 76, n. 6, p. 1309-1324, 1984.

SHONKOFF, Jack P. Building a new biodevelopmental framework to guide the future of early childhood policy. Child Development, Chicago, v. 81, n. 1, p. 357-367, 2010.

SHONKOFF, Jack P. Leveraging the biology of adversity to address the roots of disparities in health and development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, v. 109, n. 2, p. 17302- 17307, 2012. Suplemento.

SHONKOFF, Jack P. et al. The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics, Springfield, v. 129, n. 1, p. e232-e246, 2012.

SINGER, Martin H.; CROUSE, James. The relationship of context-use skills to reading: a case for an alternative experimental logic. Child Development, Chicago, v. 52, n. 4, p. 1326-1329, 1981.

SOARES, Magda. Alfabetização: a questão dos métodos. São Paulo: Contexto, 2018.

STANOVICH, Keith E. Individual differences in the cognitive processes of reading: I. Word decoding. Journal of Learning Disabilities, Chicago, v. 15, n. 8, p. 485-493, 1982a.

STANOVICH, Keith E. Individual differences in the cognitive processes of reading: II. Text-level processes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, Chicago, v. 15, n. 9, p. 549-554, 1982b.

STANOVICH, Keith E. Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, Newark, v. 21, n. 4, p. 361-407, 1986.

STANOVICH, Keith E. Putting children first by putting science first: the politics of early children instruction. In: STANOVICH, Keith E. Progress in understanding reading: scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford Press, 2000. p. 88-93.

STANOVICH, Keith E.; CUNNINGHAM, Anne E.; CRAMER, Barbara B. Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, New York, v. 38, n. 2, p. 175-190, 1984.

STANOVICH, Keith E.; CUNNINGHAM, Anne E.; FEEMAN, Dorothy J. Intelligence, cognitive skills, and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly, Newark, v. 19, n. 3, p. 278-303, 1984a.

STANOVICH, Keith E.; CUNNINGHAM, Anne E.; FEEMAN, Dorothy J. Relation between early reading acquisition and word decoding with and without context: a longitudinal study of first-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, Washington, DC, v. 76, n. 4, p. 668-677, 1984b.

VYGOTSKY, Lev S. A pré-história da linguagem escrita. In: VYGOTSKY, Lev S. A formação social da mente. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1991. p. 69-79.

Publicado

2023-12-22

Cómo citar

Right to read: what we can learn from neurosciences to augment childhood and literacy policies. (2023). Educação E Pesquisa, 49(contínuo), e249518. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634202349249518eng