Reflection and Normativism in Kant
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v22i4p103-113Keywords:
normativism, idealism, realism, reflection, politicsAbstract
The paper aims to question Kant's normativism, taking as a starting point the criticisms of Bernard Williams and Raymond Geuss to the normative perspective in political philosophy, and discussing two normative interpretations of Kant, one of them presented by J-F Kervégan and another by J. Waldron. The idea is to emphasize the reflective dimension of Kantian political idealism, its metaphysical elements, but pointing to its link with the historical, real dimension of the political.
Downloads
References
Os textos de Kant são citados sempre na edição da Academia, indicando o volume e página. As abreviações correspondem à KrV para a Crítica da Razão Pura, GMS para a Fundamentação à Metafísica dos Costumes, ZeW para À Paz Perpétua, MdS para Metafísica dos Costumes, EE para Primeira Introdução à Crítica do Juízo. As traduções utilizadas foram:
Kant, I. (2009). Fundamentação da Metafísica dos Costumes. Tradução de Guido de Almeida. São Paulo: Barcarolla.
____________. (2012). Crítica da Razão Pura. Tradução de Fernando Costa Mattos. Petrópolis: Vozes.
____________. (2013). Metafísica dos Costumes. Tradução de Clélia Martins. Petrópolis: Vozes.
Demais referências bibliográficas citadas:
Calori, F. (2015). “‘Lautdenken’: a transparência em Kant”. In: Limongi, M. I., de Figueiredo, V, & Repa, L. O público e suas formas. São Paulo: Barcarolla.
Geuss, R. (2005). Outside Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Greene, R. A. (2015). Thomas Hobbes and the Term “Right Reason”: Participation to Calculation. History of European Ideas, 41(8), pp.997-1028.
Henrich, D. (2009). O que é metafísica? – o que é modernidade? Doze teses contra Jürgen Habermas. Tradução de Fernando Costa Mattos. Cadernos de Filosofia Alemã, 14, pp.83-117.
Hobbes, T. (1997). Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kervégan, J-F. (2015). La raison des normes: essai sur Kant. Paris: Vrin.
Koselleck, R. (1973). Kritik und Krise. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkampf
Pascal, B. (1984). “Pensamentos”. In: Obras Escolhidas. Tradução de Sérgio Milliet. São Paulo: Abril.
Peres, D. T. (2004). Kant: metafísica e política. São Paulo/Salvador: UNESP/EdUFBA.
Peres, D. T. (2004b). Direito, história e esquematismo prático. Discurso, 34, pp.109-124.
Sänger, M. (1982). Die kategoriale Systematik in der “Metaphysichen Anfangsgründen der Rechtslehre”. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Strauss, L. (1953). Natural Right and History. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the Self: Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waldron, J. (1996). Kant's Legal Positivism. Harvard Law Review, 109(7), pp.1535-1566.
Williams. B. (2005). In the beginning was the deed – realism and moralism in political argument. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Information and conceptions on the texts are complete responsibility of the authors.
All the articles submitted before July 5th 2018 and those published after July 2021 are licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND license – except those published between the aforementioned dates, which are under the CC BY-NC-SA license. The permission for the translation of the material published under the license CC BY-NC-ND by third parts can be obtained with the consent of the author.
Open access policies - Diadorim
Rules applied before July 5th 2018:
Presenting a submission to our Editorial Board implies granting priority of publication for “Cadernos de filosofia alemã”, as well as transferring the copyright of texts (once published), which will be reproduced only with the manifest authorization of the editors. Authors keep the right to reuse the texts published in future editions of their work, without paying any fees to "Cadernos”. We will not grant the permission to re-edit or translate the texts for third parts without agreement of the author.
