Beautiful form and the function of aesthetical imagination

Autores/as

  • Ana Carolina de Carvalho Belmani Universidade Federal de São Carlos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v23i2p13-33

Palabras clave:

form, beauty, taste, imagination, schematism without concepts

Resumen

From the examination of the Deduction of pure aesthetic judgments, followed by its articulation with interpretations on the specifically aesthetic function of the imagination, we present the hypothesis according to which the beautiful form can be understood as a product of imagination considered as “exemplary of rules”, according to the imaginative model proposed by Hanna Ginsborg. By doing so, we contemplate the possibilities and implications of admitting the capacity of imagination to produce normative representations. Accepting her model, we intend to take a step further than the author, showing how it is opportune to elucidate the notion of beautiful form.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Allison, H. E. (2001). Kant’s Theory of Taste: a reading of the Critique of Aesthetic. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Figueiredo, V. A. (2004). Os três espectros de Kant. O que nos faz pensar, 14(18), pp.65 –100.
Fricke, C. (2001). Esquematizar sem conceitos: a teoria kantiana da reflexão estética. Cadernos de Filosofia Alemã, 7, pp.5–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v0i7p05-14.
Gasché, R. (2003). The Idea of Form: Rethinking Kant’s Aesthetics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Ginsborg, H. (1997) Lawfulness without a Law: Kant on the Free Play of Imagination and Understanding. Philosophical Topics, 25(1), pp.37–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics199725119.
Guyer, P. (1977). Formalism and the Theory of Expression in Kant’s Aesthetics. Kant-Studien, 68 (1–4), pp.46–70.
____________. (1997). Kant and the Claims of Taste. 2ª ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1902 ss). Gesammelte Schriften. Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: G. Reimer W. de Gruyter.
____________. (2014). Manual dos cursos de Lógica Geral. Tradução de Fausto Castilho. 3ª ed. Campinas, SP: Editora Unicamp.
____________. (2015). Crítica da razão pura. Tradução de Fernando Costa Mattos. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.
____________. (2016). Crítica da faculdade de julgar. Tradução de Fernando Costa Mattos. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.
Makkreel, R. A. (1990). Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: the Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Zammito, J. H. (1992). The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Chicago, IL/London, ENG: The University of Chicago Press.

Publicado

2018-12-22

Número

Sección

Artigos

Cómo citar

Beautiful form and the function of aesthetical imagination. (2018). Cadernos De Filosofia Alemã: Crítica E Modernidade, 23(2), 13-33. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v23i2p13-33