A esfera pública: ideologia e/ou ideal?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v26i3p109-117Keywords:
Amy Allen, Habermas , Nancy Fraser, Public Sphere, FeminismAbstract
Translation of Allen, A. (2012). The public sphere: ideology and/or ideal?. Political Theory, 40, p. 822-829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591712457664.
Translated by Amanda Soares de Melo
Downloads
References
Benhabib, S. (1992). “Models of Public Space: Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition, and Jürgen Habermas” em Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics, New York: Routledge, p. 100.
Brunkhorst, H., Kreide, R., & Lafont, C. (2009). “Öffentlichkeit” em HabermasHandbuch. Stuttgart: JB Metzler Verlag.
Calhoun, C. (1992). Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fraser, N. (1997a) “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy” em Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge.
Fraser, N. (1997b). “Sex, Lies, and the Public Sphere: Reflections on the Confirmation of Clarence Thomas,” de Nancy Fraser em Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition, New York: Routledge.
Fraser, N. (2007). “Transnationalizing the Public Sphere: On the Legitimacy and Efficacy of Public Opinion in a Post-Westphalian World” em Theory, Culture, and Society, no. 4, p. 7-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407080090.
Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Tradução de T. Burger. Cambridge: MIT Press. [Mudança estrutural da esfera pública: investigações sobre uma categoria da sociedade burguesa. Tradução de Denilson Luís. 1ª Edição. Editora Unesp, 2014].
Habermas, J. (1992). “Further reflections on the public sphere” em Habermas and the public sphere de Craig Calhoun, p. 421-461. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1998). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, tradução de William Rehg, Cambridge: MIT Press. [Facticidade e Validade: Contribuições Para Uma Teoria Discursiva do Direito e da Democracia. Tradução de Rúrion Melo e Felipe Gonçalves. 1ª edição. Editora Unesp, 2020.]
Habermas, J. (1998). The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Ed. Ciaran Cronin e Pablo de Greiff. Cambridge: MIT Press [A inclusão do outro: estudos de teoria política. Tradução de Denilson Luis Werle. 1ª Edição. Editora Unesp, 2018]
Habermas, J. (2001). “The Postnational Constellation and the Future of Democracy” em The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, p. 98–103. Cambridge: Polity Press. [A constelação pós-nacional: ensaios políticos. Tradução de Márcio Seligmann-Silva. São Paulo: Littera Mundi, 2001]
Habermas, J. (2006a). “Does Europe Need a Constitution?” in Time of Transitions, ed. e trad. Ciaran Cronin and Max Pensky, p. 102–106. Cambridge: Polity Press. [A inclusão do outro: estudos de teoria política. Tradução de Denilson Luis Werle. 1ª Edição. Editora Unesp, 2018]
Habermas, J. (2006b). “Does the Constitutionalization of International Law Still Have a Chance?” em The Divided West, p. 142–143. Cambridge: Polity Press. [O Ocidente dividido. Tradução de Bianca Tavolari. 1ª Edição. Editora Unesp, 2016].
Habermas, J. (2006b). “Is the Development of a European Identity Necessary, and Is It Possible?” em The Divided West. Cambridge: Polity Press [O Ocidente dividido. Tradução de Bianca Tavolari. 1ª Edição. Editora Unesp, 2016].
Hutchings, K. (2007). Whose history? Whose justice? Theory, Culture & Society, 24(4), 59-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407080094
Mccarthy, T. (2009). Race, empire, and the idea of human development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Randeria, S. (2007). De-politicization of Democracy and Judicialization of Politics. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(4), 38-44. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1177/0263276407080398.
Salvatore, A. (2007). The exit from a Westphalian framing of political space and the emergence of a transnational Islamic public. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(4), 45-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407080092.
Scheuerman, W. (2008). Global Governance without Global Government? Habermas on Postnational Democracy. Political Theory, 36(1), 133–151. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1177/0090591707310100.
Ugarteche, O. (2007). Transnationalizing the public sphere: A critique of Fraser. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(4), 65-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407080095.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Amanda Soares de Melo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Information and conceptions on the texts are complete responsibility of the authors.
All the articles submitted before July 5th 2018 and those published after July 2021 are licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND license – except those published between the aforementioned dates, which are under the CC BY-NC-SA license. The permission for the translation of the material published under the license CC BY-NC-ND by third parts can be obtained with the consent of the author.
Open access policies - Diadorim
Rules applied before July 5th 2018:
Presenting a submission to our Editorial Board implies granting priority of publication for “Cadernos de filosofia alemã”, as well as transferring the copyright of texts (once published), which will be reproduced only with the manifest authorization of the editors. Authors keep the right to reuse the texts published in future editions of their work, without paying any fees to "Cadernos”. We will not grant the permission to re-edit or translate the texts for third parts without agreement of the author.
