Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule - WHODAS 2.0

Authors

  • Shamyr Sulyvan Castro Universidade Federal do Ceará; Department of Physical Therapy
  • Camila Ferreira Leite Universidade Federal do Ceará; Department of Physical Therapy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/17118724042017

Keywords:

Functioning, Translation

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) planned a new functioning assessment tool - the WHODAS 2.0 (World Health Assessment Disability Schedule 2.0) - a user-friendly application instrument based on the theoretical framework of the ICF. The aim of this article is to introduce the Brazilian version of WHODAS to clinical and academic users interested in the assessment of functioning. The process was conducted according to the Translation Package offered by WHO, in addition to the permission for translating the tool. Three translators worked in this research to produce the definitive version of the manual and a set of linguistic evaluation forms. Finally, the Brazilian version was approved by WHO. All documents about WHODAS were translated and are free to download on the internet. WHODAS 2.0 addresses functioning according to the ICF domains and keeps the multifactorial and biopsychosocial perspective of the phenomenon. As it has an ICF differentiate presentation, the data collection is faster (20 minutes, on average) and more objective. Besides, it was planned to be a generic and transcultural tool. WHODAS was translated and is available on Internet to use. It is expected that the use of WHODAS will be widespread in Brazil, in clinical and research settings, aiming at the biopsychosocial approach of the functioning, as endorsed by WHO.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Organização Mundial da Saúde. CIF: Classificação

Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade E Saúde. São

Paulo: Edusp; 2003.

Altman BM, Gulley SP. Convergence and divergence:

differences in disability prevalence estimates in the

United States and Canada based on four health survey

instruments. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(4):543-552. doi: 10.1016/j.

socscimed.2009.06.017

McDermott S, Turk MA. The myth and reality of disability

prevalence: measuring disability for research and service.

Disabil Health J. 2011;4(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2010.06.002

Altman BM. A reply to: the myth and reality of disability

prevalence: measuring disability for research and

service. Disabil Health J. 2011;4(3):198-9. doi: 10.1016/j.

dhjo.2011.04.002

Di Nubila HBV, Buchalla CM. O papel das Classificações da

OMS – CID e CIF nas definições de deficiência e incapacidade.

Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2008;11(2):324-35. doi: 10.1590/

S1415-790X2008000200014

Kostanjsek N. Use of The International Classification of

Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual

framework and common language for disability statistics and

health information systems. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(Suppl

:S3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S4-S3

Brunani A, Raggi A, Sirtori A, Berselli ME, Villa V, Ceriani F, et

al. An ICF-Based Model for Implementing and Standardizing

Multidisciplinary Obesity Rehabilitation Programs within

the Healthcare System. Int J Environ Res Public Health.

;12(6):6084-91. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120606084

Üstün B, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N. Comments from who for

the journal of rehabilitation medicine special supplement on

ICF core sets. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36(Suppl. 44):7-8. doi:

1080/16501960410015344

Organização Mundial da Saúde. Checklist da CIF. Brasília, DF:

OMS; 2003. [cited 2017 jun 21]. Available from: http://www.

fsp.usp.br/cbcd/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/LISTA-DECONFERE%CC%82NCIA-DA-CIF-2004.pdf

Üstün TB, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, Rehm J. Measuring

Health and Disability: Manual for WHO Disability Assessment

Schedule (WHODAS 2.0). Malta: World Health Organization;

Castro SS, Leite CF, editores. Avaliação de saúde e

deficiência: manual do WHO disability assessment

schedule (WHODAS 2.0). Uberaba: Universidade

Federal do Triângulo Mineiro; 2015. [cited 2017

Ju 21]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/

bitstream/10665/43974/19/9788562599514_por.pdf

Jardim R, Barreto SM, Giatti L. Confiabilidade das informações

obtidas de informante secundário em inquéritos de saúde.

Cad Saude Publica. 2010;26(8):1537-48. doi: 10.1590/

S0102-311X2010000800008

Downloads

Published

2017-12-12

Issue

Section

Original Research

How to Cite

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule - WHODAS 2.0. (2017). Fisioterapia E Pesquisa, 24(4), 385-391. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/17118724042017