Systematization of evaluation instruments for the two first years of life of typical or risk infants according to the ICF model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/18026126042019Keywords:
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Child Development;, Physical Therapy Specialty, HealthAbstract
The objective of this study was to identify low-cost instruments of evaluation of neuropsychomotor development (NPMD) of children aged zero to two years, that can be used in the context of daycare and/or clinical environment in early intervention programs, and to systematize these instruments as the biopsychosocial model of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). NPMD evaluation instruments with translation or adaptation for Brazil were selected. For this purpose, the ICF domains were chosen triangulating the ICF-CY’s own checklist, the early stimulation core set, and the latest version of the ICF for searching the evaluation instruments in literature. Two physical therapists and a third for discordant items performed the systematization of the selected categories of ICF. The scales that met the criteria were: Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS), Denver II Screening Test, PedIatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedSQl ™), Affordance in the Home Environment for Motor Development-Infant Scale (AHEMD-IS) and Mother-child bond. Even with these scales, there was a need for a complementary anamnesis questionnaire for the infant’s caregiver, data from the Child Health Handbook and a socioeconomic questionnaire from the Brazilian Association of Research Companies for Brazil (ABEP). This systematization is available in the appendix and seeks to facilitate the broader view of the physical therapist or education professional with a biopsychosocial comprehension of the infants, in addition to allowing the early identification of risks and subsidizing actions of promotion and intervention in different contexts.
Downloads
References
Gannotti ME, Christy JB, Heathcock JC, Kolobe TH. A path model
for evaluating dosing parameters for children with cerebral
palsy. Phys Ther. 2014;94(3):411-21. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130022
Hwang AW, Liao HF, Chen PC, Hsieh WS, Simeonsson RJ,
Weng LJ, et al. Applying the ICF-CY framework to examine
biological and environmental factors in early childhood
development. J Formos Med Assoc. 2014;113(5):303-12. doi:
1016/j.jfma.2011.10.004
Araujo LB, Mélo TR, Israel VL. Low birth weight, family income
and paternal absence as risk factors in neuropsychomotor
development. J Hum Growth Dev. 2017;27(3):272-80. doi:
7322/jhgd.124072
Pan YL, Hwang AW, Simeonsson RJ, Lu L, Liao HF. ICF-CY
code set for infants with early delay and disabilities (EDD
Code Set) for interdisciplinary assessment: a global
experts survey. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(12):1044-54. doi:
3109/09638288.2014.952454
Bickenbach J, Cieza A, Rauch A, Stucki G, editors. ICF core
sets: manual for clinical practice. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe
Publishing; 2012.
Biscegli TS, Polis LB, Santos LM, Vicentin M. Avaliação do estado
nutricional e do desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor em crianças
freqüentadoras de creche. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2007;25(4):337-42.
doi: 10.1590/S0103-05822007000400007
Walker SP, Wachs TD, Gardner JM, Lozoff B, Wasserman GA, Pollitt
E, et al. Child development: risk factors for adverse outcomes
in developing countries. Lancet. 2007;369(9556):145-57.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60076-2
Gonçalves DMO, Gomes-da-Silva PN, Andrade FCB. No
princípio é o ludens: integração do self do bebê através do
brincar em creche. Movimento. 2017;23(2):617-32. doi: doi.org/
22456/1982-8918.64286
McCoy DC, Sudfeld CR, Bellinger DC, Muhihi A, Ashery G, Weary
TE, et al. Development and validation of an early childhood
development scale for use in low-resourced settings. Popul
Health Metr. 2017;15(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12963-017-0122-8
Modelo de funcionalidade: Checklist da CIF-CJ. [place unknown:
publisher unknown]; 2007 [cited 2018 June 20]. Available from:
Organização Mundial de Saúde. CIF: Classificação Internacional
de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde. São Paulo: Edusp; 2015.
World Health Organization. International Classification of
Functioning, Disability, and Health: children & youth version:
ICF-CY. Geneva: WHO; 2007.
Mancini MC, Coster WJ, Amaral MF, Avelar BS, Freitas R,
Sampaio RF. New version of the Pediatric Evaluation of
Disability Inventory (PEDI-CAT): translation, cultural adaptation
to Brazil and analyses of psychometric properties. Braz J Phys
Ther. 2016;20(6):561-70. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0166
Darrah J, Bartlett D, Maguire TO, Avison WR, Lacaze-Masmonteil T.
Have infant gross motor abilities changed in 20 years? A
re-evaluation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale normative values.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56(9):877-81. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12452
Frankenburg WK, Dodds J, Archer P, Bresnick B, Maschka
P, Edelman N, et al. Denver II: Teste de Triagem do
Desenvolvimento: manual técnico. Sabatés AL, editor. São
Paulo: Hogrefe; 2018.
Varni JW, Limbers CA, Neighbors K, Schulz K, Lieu JE, Heffer
RW, et al. The PedsQL™ Infant Scales: feasibility, internal
consistency reliability, and validity in healthy and ill infants.
Qual Life Res. 2011;20(1):45-55. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9730-5
Caçola PM, Gabbard C, Montebelo MI, Santos DC. Further
development and validation of the affordances in the home
environment for motor development-infant scale (AHEMD-IS).
Phys Ther. 2015;95(6):901-23. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140011
Mäder CVDN, Monteiro VLDA, Spada PV, Nóbrega FJD.
Avaliação do vínculo mãe-filho e saúde mental de mães de
crianças com deficiência intelectual. Einstein. 2013;11(1):63-70.
doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082013000100012
Sigolo ARL, Aiello ALR. Análise de instrumentos para triagem
do desenvolvimento infantil. Paidéia. 2011;21(48):51-60. doi:
1590/S0103-863X2011000100007
Pernambuco AP, Lana RC, Polese JC. Knowledge and use of
the ICF in clinical practice by physiotherapists and occupational
therapists of Minas Gerais. Fisioter Pesqui. 2018;25(2):134-42.
doi: 10.1590/1809-2950/16765225022018
Saccani R, Valentini NC, Pereira KR. New Brazilian developmental
curves and reference values for the Alberta infant motor scale.
Infant Behav Dev. 2016;45:38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.09.002
Dornelas LF, Duarte NMC, Magalhães LC. Atraso do
desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor: mapa conceitual,
definições, usos e limitações do termo. Rev Paul Pediatr.
;33(1):88-103. doi: 10.1016/j.rpped.2014.04.009
Vieira ME, Ribeiro FV, Formiga C. Principais instrumentos de
avaliação de desenvolvimento da criança de zero a dois anos
de idade. Rev Mov. 2009;2(1):23-31.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Diretrizes de estimulação precoce:
crianças de zero a 3 anos com atraso no desenvolvimento
neuropsicomotor decorrentes de microcefalia. Brasília, DF; 2016.
Saccani R, Valentini NC. Curvas de referência da Escala
Motora Infantil de Alberta: percentis para descrição clínica e
acompanhamento do desempenho motor ao longo do tempo.
J Pediatr. 2012;88(1):40-7. doi: 10.2223/JPED.2142
Darrah J, Piper M, Watt MJ. Assessment of gross motor skills
of at-risk infants: predictive validity of the Alberta Infant
Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998;40(7):485-91. doi:
1111/j.1469-8749.1998.tb15399.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Tainá Ribas Mélo, Luize Bueno de Araujo, Karize Rafaela Mesquita Novakoski, Vera Lúcia Israel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
