Knee and ankle disorders during functional gait in mucopolysaccharidosis type VI

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/21003228012021

Keywords:

Mucopolysaccharidosis VI, Gait, Range of Motion, Articular

Abstract

To evaluate knee and ankle disorders during functional gait assessment in individuals with Mucopolysaccharidosis type VI (MPS VI). 19 subjects were included in this cross-sectional study and allocated in three groups according to age: Children Group (n=11); Adolescent Group (n=4); and Adult Group (n=4). Subphases of one gait cycle were analyzed: Initial contact; Medium support, and Pre-Balance. All volunteers with MPS VI presented greater knee and ankle flexion angles, in all gait subphases, when compared to the normal values defined by literature (p<0.05). Initial contact subphase: knee flexion angle ranging from 8.5º to 15º; Ankle = Child Group −23.73º ± 8.53º; Adolescent Group = −25º ± 11.22º; Adult Group =  27.75º ± 3.3º. Medium support  subphase: Knee = Child Group 19.64º± 10.47º; Adolescent Group 16.75º ± 10.34º; Adult Group = 21.25º ± 12.84º.Ankle = Child Group −18.82º ± 8.91º ± 8.53º; Adolescent Group = −16.5º ± 9.33º; Adult Group = −22.25º± 4.19º. Pre-Balance subphase: Knee = Child Group 22.72º ± 13.49º;  Adolescent Group 21.25º ± 7.97º; Adult Group = 27º ± 16.27º. Ankle = Child Group -15º ± 9.76º; Adolescent Group = −15.75º ± 5.31º; Adult Group = −14.75º ± 3.86º. In this study, MPS VI individuals presented hyperflexion of knee and ankle as the main joint disorders during functional gait,  regardless of age.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akyol MU, Alden TD, Amartino H, Ashworth J, Belani K, Berger KI, et al. Recommendations for the management of MPS VI: systematic evidence- and consensus-based guidance. Orphanet

J Rare Dis. 2019;14:118-39. doi: 10.1186/s13023-019-1080-y

Harmatz P, Shediac R. Mucopolysaccharidosis VI: pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Front Biosci. 2017;1;22:385-406. doi: 10.2741/4490

Matos MA, Prado A, Schenkel G, Barreto R, Acosta AX. Gasto energético na marcha em pacientes com mucopolissacaridose. Acta Ortop Bras. 2013;21(2):116-9. doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522013000200009

Figueirêdo BBRS, Magalhães PAF, Andrade LBD, Patrícia B, Duarte MCMB. Nível de independência, capacidade funcional e força muscular respiratória de pacientes com mucopolissacaridose tipo VI no Nordeste do Brasil. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant.

;18(1):83-92. doi: 10.1590/1806-93042018000100004

Morais Filho MC, Reis RAD, Kawamura CM. Avaliação do padrão de movimento dos joelhos e tornozelos durante a maturação da marcha normal. Acta Ortop Bras. 2020;18(1):23-25. doi:

1590/S1413-78522010000100004

Calloni, GJ. A Física dos movimentos analisada a partir de vídeos do cotidiano do aluno: Uma proposta para oitava série [dissertation]. Porto Alegre: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; 2010 [cited 2021 Jan 21]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/28179

Kadaba, MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthop Res. 1990;8(3):383-92. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100080310

Perry J, editor. Análise de Marcha. São Paulo: Manole; 2005.

Rose J, Gamble JG, editors. Marcha Humana. São Paulo: Premier; 1998.

Jurecka A, Zakharova E, Malinova V, Voskoboeva E, Tylki-Szymańska A. Attenuated osteoarticular phenotype of type VI mucopolysaccharidosis: A report of four patients and a review of the literature. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33:725-31. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2423-z

Cardoso-Santos A, Azevedo ACMM, Simone F, Burin MG, Giugliani R, Schwartz IVD. Mucopolysaccharidosis type VI (Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome): assessment of joint mobility

and grip and pinch strength. J Pediatr. 2008;84(2):130-5. doi: 10.1590/S0021-75572008000200007

Azevedo AC, Schwartz IV, Kalakun L, Brustolin S, Burin MG, Beheregaray AP. Clinical and biochemical study of 28 patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type VI. Clin Genet. 2004;66:208-

doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00277.x

Valayannopoulos V, Nicely H, Harmatz P, Turbeville A. Mucopolysaccharidosis VI. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2010;5(5):1-20. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-5-5

Bulut E, Pektas E, Sivri HS, Bilginer B, Umaroglu MM, Ozgen B. Evaluation of spinal involvement in children with mucopolysaccharidosis VI: the role of MRI. Br J Radiol.

;91(1085):20170744. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170744

Solank GA, Sun PP, Martin KW, Hendriksz CJ, Guffon CLN, Hung A et al. Cervical cord compression in mucopolysaccharidosis VI (MPS VI): Findings from the MPS VI Clinical Surveillance Program (CSP). Mol Genet Metabol. 2016;118:310-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2016.06.001

Doriot N, Chèze L. A three-dimensional kinematic and dynamic study of the lower limb during the stance phase of gait using an homogeneous matrix approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng.

;51(1):21-7. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2003.820357

Iwabe C, Diz MA, Barudy DP. Análise cinemática da marcha em indivíduos com Acidente Vascular Encefálico. Rev Neurocienc. 2008;16(4):292-6. doi: 10.34024/rnc.2008.v16.8618

Medeiros JNS, Silva BBR, Queiroz DR, Cattuzzo MT, Soares KMS. Avaliação da força de preensão e amplitude de movimentos dos membros superiores em pacientes com mucopolissacaridose VI. Acta Fisiatr. 2015;22(2):60-4. doi: 10.5935/0104-7795.20150013

Suarez-Guerrero JL, Higuera JP, Arias JSF, Contreras-García GA. Mucopolisacaridosis: características clínicas, diagnóstico y de manejo. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2016;87(4):295-304. doi: 10.1016/j.rchipe.2015.10.004

Giugliani R, Federhen A, Rojas MVM; Vieira TA; Artigalás O, Pinto, LLC, et al. Terapia de reposição enzimática para as mucopolissacaridoses I, II e VI: recomendações de um grupo

de especialistas brasileiros. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2010;56:257-77. doi: 10.1590/S0104 42302010000300009

Iwabe CR, Frezzato RC, Nogueira AN. Evolução motora de paciente com mucopolissacaridose tipo 1. Rev Paul Pediatra. 2010;28(3):372-5. doi: 10.1590/S0103-05822010000300018

Downloads

Published

2023-02-23

Issue

Section

Original Research

How to Cite

Knee and ankle disorders during functional gait in mucopolysaccharidosis type VI. (2023). Fisioterapia E Pesquisa, 28(1), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/21003228012021