Saúde mental, democracia e responsabilidade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19938Palavras-chave:
saúde mental, democracia, manicômios judiciários, responsabilidadeResumo
No presente artigo se abordam as relações entre saúde mental e as tarefas atuais da democracia no Brasil e, nesse contexto, os desafios que os Hospitais de Custódia e Tratamento Psiquiátrico representam para o campo da saúde mental. Considera-se que os Manicômios Judiciários, sua lógica, sua população constituem uma das últimas fronteiras relativamente resistentes ao avanço do movimento antimanicomial. Com sua especificidade e ambiguidade, entre o crime e a loucura, eles produzem e reproduzem de maneira prática o mito da periculosidade. Nesse contexto, o artigo examina, especificamente, a questão da responsabilidade do louco infrator.Downloads
Referências
Correia L C, Lima IMSO, Alves VS. Direitos das pessoas com transtorno mental autoras de delitos. Cad. Saúde Pública, 2007; 23(9).
Miller J A Lacan elucidado. Palestras no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar; 1997.
Freud S The Schreber Case, NY, London: Peguin Books; 2003.
Ferraz FC Perversão, São Paulo, Casa do Psicólogo; 2006.
Eglander E. K. Understanding Violence, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006.
Políticas públicas de/para/com juventudes. Brasília: Unesco, 2004.
Foucault M. Vigiar e Punir: nascimento da prisão, Petrópolis: Vozes; 1987.
Maciel LR. Um lugar para aprisionar a loucura criminosa. Hist. Cienc. Saude-Manguinhos. 1999;6(2).
Código Penal do Brasil. São Paulo, Brasil. Saraiva; 2001.
Andrade O. Manifesto Antropófago [1928]in: A Utopia Antropofágica, Obras Completas de Oswald de Andrade. São Paulo: Globo; 1990.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis