Plataformas de propriedade de trabalhadores: cooperativas e coletivos de entregadores
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v16i1p209-233Mots-clés :
Cooperativismo de plataforma, Plataformas de propriedade de trabalhadores, Plataformização do trabalhoRésumé
O artigo tem o objetivo de analisar a emergência de plataformas de propriedade de entregadores no contexto de plataformização do trabalho. A análise apresenta seis casos em Espanha, França e Brasil, considerando: processos produtivos e organização do trabalho, desafios tecnológicos e construção de plataformas, usos de mídias sociais para organização e comunicação entre trabalhadores, cooperação entre cooperativas e futuro das experiências autogestionadas. As conclusões apontam para o papel central de mídias sociais para comunicação e organização do trabalho, e a cooperação entre cooperativas. Essas iniciativas podem ser o início de um processo mais amplo de plataformas digitais para o bem comum
##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##
Références
Abílio, L., Amorim, H., & Grohmann, R. (2021). Uberização e plataformização do trabalho no Brasil: Conceitos, processos e formas. Sociologias, 23(57), 26-56. https://doi.org/10.1590/15174522-116484
Abílio, L., Grohmann, R., & Weiss, H. (2021). Struggles of delivery workers in Brazil: Working conditions and collective organization during the pandemic. Journal of Labour and Society, 24(4), 598-616. https://doi.org/10.1163/24714607-bja10012
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (1999). The new spirit of capitalism. Verso.
Calzada, I. (2020). Platform and data co-operatives amidst European pandemic citizenship. Sustainability, 20(12), 8309. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208309
Cant, C. (2019). Riding for deliveroo: Resistance in the new economy. Polity.
Casilli, A. (2019). En attendant les robots: Enquête sur le travail du clic. Seuil.
Casilli, A., & Posada, J. (2019). The platformization of labor and society. In M. Graham & W. Dutton (Eds.), Society and the internet (pp. 293-305). OUP.
Chen, J. & Qiu, J. (2019). Digital utility: Datafication, regulation, labor, and Didi’s platformization of urban transport in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 274-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1614964
Cicero, S., Agamennone, C., & Battaglia, E. (2016). A review of methodologies for the design and incubation of collaborative platforms. Dimmons IN3 Research Institute.
Colclough, C. (2020). Towards workers’ data collectives. IT For Change. https://bit.ly/3h3Mdqf
Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice. MIT Press.
Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2013). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society. Verso.
Davis, M., & Xiao, J. (2021). De-westernizing platform studies: History and logics of Chinese and US platforms. International Journal of Communication, 15, 103-122. https://bit.ly/3CF7RuI
de Peuter, G., & Dyer-Witheford, N. (2010). Commons and cooperatives. Affinities: A Journal of Radical Theory, Culture, and Action, 4(1), 30-56. https://bit.ly/3s8Rq6n
Dyer-Witheford, N. (2015). Cyber-proletariat: Global labour in the digital vortex. Pluto.
Englert, S., Woodcock, J., & Cant, C. (2020). Digital workerism: Technology, platforms, and the circulation of workers’ struggles. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 18(2020), 132-145. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v18i1.1133
Evangelista, R., & Bruno, F. (2019). WhatsApp and political instability in Brazil: Targeted messages and political radicalization. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1434
Fairwork. (2020). The gig economy and COVID-19: Looking ahead. The Fairwork Project. https://bit.ly/3JJOCT9
Fenton, N. (2016). Digital, political, radical. Polity Press.
Fernández, A., & Barreiro, M. (2020). The algorithms is not my boss anymore: Technological appropriation and (new) media strategies in Riders x Derechos and Mensakas. Contracampo, 39(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.22409/contracampo.v39i1.38404
Ferrari, F., & Graham, M. (2021). Fissuras no poder algorítmico: Plataformas, códigos e contestação. Fronteiras, 23(2), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.4013/fem.2021.232.14
Fuchs, C. (2017). Social media: A critical introduction. Sage.
Geelan, T., & Hodder, A. (2017). Enhancing transnational labour solidarity: The unfulfilled promise of the Internet and social media. Industrial Relations Journal, 48(4), 345-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12190
Graham, M., & Anwar, M. (2019). The global gig economy: Towards a planetary labour market? First Monday, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i4.9913
Graham, M., Woodcockh, J., Heeks, R., Mungai, P., Van Belle, J.-P., du Toit, D., Fredman, S., Osikid, A., der Spuy, A., & Silbermang, S. M. (2020). The Fairwork Foundation: Strategies for improving platform work in a global context. Geoforum, 112, 100-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.01.023
Grohmann, R. (2018). Cooperativismo de plataforma e suas contradições: análise de iniciativas da área de comunicação no Platform. Coop. Liinc em Revista, 14(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v14i1.4149
Grohmann, R. (2021). Trabalho digital: O papel organizador da comunicação. Comunicação, Mídia e Consumo, 18(51), 166-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.18568/cmc.v18i51.2279
Grohmann, R., & Alves, P. (2020, outubro). Unions and associations of app-drivers in Brazil: The meanings in circulation of platform workers’ struggles [Apresentação de trabalho]. In C. Soriano, R. Grohmann, J. Chen, A. Karatzogianni, J. Cabanes & P. Alves, Digital labor solidarities, collective formations, and relational infrastructures. Panel Presented at AoIR 2020: The 21th Annual Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers. Evento virtual.
Grohmann, R., & Qiu, J. (2020). Contextualizing platform labor. Contracampo, 39(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.22409/contracampo.v39i1.42260
Grohmann, R., Nonato, C., Marques, A., & Camargo, C. (2021). As estratégias de comunicação das plataformas de trabalho: Circulação de sentidos nas mídias sociais das empresas no Brasil. Comunicação e Sociedade, 39, 17-37. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.39(2021).2879
Grohmann, R., Pereira, G., Guerra, A., Abílio, L., Moreschi, B., & Jurno, A. (no prelo). Platform scams: Brazilian workers’ experiences of dishonest and uncertain algorithmic management. New Media & Society.
Howson, K., Ustek-Spilda, F., Grohmann, R., Salem, N., Carelli, R., Abs, D., Salvagni, J., Graham, M., Balbornoz, M. B., Chavez, H., Arriagada, A., & Bonhomme, M. (2020). ‘Just because you don’t see your boss, doesn’t mean you don’t have a boss’: COVID-19 and gig worker strikes across Latin America. International Union Rights, 27(3), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.14213/inteuniorigh.27.3.0020
Huws, U. (2020). Reinventing the welfare state: Digital platforms and public policies. Pluto.
Lazar, T., & Davidson, R. (2020). Mobile social media as platforms in workers’ unionization. Information, Communication & Society, 23(3), 437-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1510536
Morell, M., & Espelt, R. (2019). A framework to assess the sustainability of platform economy: The case of Barcelona ecosystem. Sustainability, 11(22), 6450. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226450
Morell, M., Espelt, R., & Cano, M. (2020). Sustainable platform economy: Connections with the sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 12(8), 7640. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187640
Patrick-Thomson, H., & Kranert, M. (2020). Don’t work for free: Online discursive resistance to precarity in commercial photography. Work, Employment and Society, 35(6), 1034-1052. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020952630
Pazaitis, A., Kostakis, V., & Bauwens, M. (2017). Digital economy and the rise of open cooperativism: The case of the Enspiral Network. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916683865
Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & Van Dijck, J. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425
Qiu, J., Gregg, M., Crawford, K. (2014). Circuits of labour: A labour theory of the iPhone Era. TripleC, 14(2), 564-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v12i2.540
Sadowski, J. (2020). The internet of the landlords: Digital platforms and new mechanisms of rentier capitalism. Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography, 52(2), 562-580. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12595
Sandoval, M. (2016). Fighting precarity with cooperation? Worker co-operatives in the cultural sector. New Formations, 88, 51-68. https://doi.org/10.3898/NEWF.88.04.2016
Sandoval, M. (2018). From passionate labour to compassionate work: Cultural co-ops, do what you love and social change. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(2), 113-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417719011
Sandoval, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial activism? Platform cooperativism between subversion and co-optation. Critical Sociology, 46(6), 801-817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920519870577
Schmidt, F. (2017). Digital labour markets in the platform economy: Mapping the political challenges of crowd work and gig work. Friedrich-Ebert-Stitftung.
Scholz, T. (2016). Platform cooperativism: Challenging the corporate sharing economy. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung New York Office.
Schor, J. (2020). After the gig: How the sharing economy got hijacked and how to win it back. University of California Press.
Schor, J., Attwood-Charles, W., Cansoy, M., Ladegaard, I., & Wengronowitz, R. (2020). Dependence and precarity in the platform economy. Theory and Society, 49, 833-861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09408-y
Schradie, J. (2019). The revolution that wasn’t: How digital activism favors conservatives. Harvard University Press.
Sodré, M. (2014). A ciência do comum. Vozes.
Soriano, C., & Cabanes, J. (2020). Entrepreneurial solidarities: Social media collectives and Filipino digital platform workers. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120926484
Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.
Sun, P. (2019). Your order, their labor: An exploration of algorithms and laboring on food delivery platforms in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 308-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1583676
Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society. Oxford.
Van Dijck, J. (2021). Seeing the forest for the trees: Visualizing platformization and its governance. New Media & Society, 23(9), 2801-2819. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820940293
Van Doorn, N. (2017). Platform labor: On the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’ economy. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 898-914. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1294194
Williams, R. (2005). Culture and materialism. Verso.
Wood, A., Lehdonvirta, V., & Graham, M. (2018). Workers of the Internet unite? Online freelancer organisation among remote gig economy workers in six Asian and African countries. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(2), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12112
Woodcock, J. (2019). Marx at the arcade: Consoles, controllers, and class struggle. Haymarket Books.
Woodcock, J., & Graham, M. (2019). The gig economy: A critical introduction. Polity.
Wright, E. (2010). Envisioning real utopias. Verso.
Zhu, J., & Marjanovic, O. (2020). How do platform cooperatives contribute to sustainable development goals? AMCIS 2020 Proceedings, 8. https://bit.ly/3H8a16H
Téléchargements
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Copyright Rafael Grohmann 2022
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
Les auteurs qui publient dans ce journal acceptent les termes suivants:
- Les auteurs conservent le droit d'auteur et accordent à la revue le droit de première publication, le travail étant concédé simultanément sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) qui permet le partage de l'œuvre avec reconnaissance de la paternité et de la publication initiale dans cette revue à des fins non commerciales.
- Les auteurs sont autorisés à assumer des contrats supplémentaires séparément, pour une distribution non exclusive de la version de l'ouvrage publiée dans cette revue (par exemple, publication dans un référentiel institutionnel ou en tant que chapitre de livre), avec reconnaissance de la paternité et de la publication initiale dans cette revue.