Neuromuscular responses during different hand positions in indoor rock climbing

Authors

  • Silviane Sebold Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Escola de Educação Física, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
  • Bruno Brasil Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brasil.
  • Cristine Lima Alberton Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brasil.
  • Stephanie Santana Pinto Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brasil.
  • Luiz Fernando Martins Kruel Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Escola de Educação Física, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-4690.2022e36207112

Keywords:

Electromyography, Maximal isometric voluntary contraction, Flexor carpi radialis, Extensor digitorum communis

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the neuromuscular responses of the wrist and digits extensors and flexors among four hand positions in indoor rock climbing. Twelve men (33.00±8.30 years) practitioners of indoor rock climbing underwent a skin preparation to the electromyography (EMG) signal data collection from the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and extensor digitorum communis (EDC). After randomize the hand positions configurations (cambered, pinch, open and crimp), subjects were placed in the structure of the indoor rock climbing supported with their feet and hands in four holds. The EMG data were collected three times during 10 s, with 1 min interval. The cambered showed significant greater EMG values for the FCR compared to open and crimp hand positions (Cambered: 119.05±69.08 %; Pinch: 91.92±39.36 %; Open: 78.28±52.89 %; Crimp: 71.86±45.65 %). For the EDC, it was verified that the cambered presented significant lower values than pinch and crimp hand positions (Cambered: 20.59±16.04 %; Pinch: 58.68±64.10 %; Open: 61.51±74.04 %; Crimp: 55.32±57.29). Thus, the hand position configuration exerts influence in the muscular activity of wrist and digits extensors and flexors. Thus, the knowledge of the muscular activity in different hand positions configurations may bring relevant information to optimize the physical training in indoor rock climbing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mermier CM, Robergs RA, McMinn SM et al. Energy expenditure and physiological responses during indoor rock climbing. Br J Sports Med. 1997;31:224-228.

Mermier CM, Janot JM, Parker DL et al. Physiological and anthropometric determinants of sport climbing performance. Br J Sports Med. 2000;34:359-465.

Costa CSC. Formação profissional no esporte escalada [dissertação]. Rio de Janeiro (RJ): Universidade Gama Filho; 2004.

Booth J, Marino F, Hill C et al. Energy cost of sport rock climbing in elite performers. Br J Sports Med. 1999;33:14-18.

Úbeda Palomares AB. Valoración de la fuerza de agarre en escaladores. Rev Int Med Cienc Act Fis Deporte. 2004;4:122-143.

Watts PB, Jensen RL. Reliability of peak forces during a finger curl motion common in rock climbing. Measurement Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2003;7:263-267.

Jensen RL, Watts PB, Lawrence JE et al. Vertical hand force and forearm EMG during a high-step rock-on climbing move with and without added mass. 23 International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports; 22-27 ago-05; Beijing, CH. Beijing: Quing Wang; 2005. p.466-469.

Bertuzzi RCM, Gagliardi JFL, Franchini E et al. Características antropométricas e desempenho motor de escaladores esportivos brasileiros de elite e intermediários que praticam predominantemente a modalidade indoor. Rev Bras Ciênc Mov. 2001;9:7-12.

Watts PB, Jensen RL, Agena SM et al. Changes in EMG and finger force with repeated hangs from the hands in rock climbers. Int J Exerc Sci. 2008b;1:62-70.

Watts PB, Jensen RL, Gannon E et al. Forearm EMG during rock climbing differs from EMG during handgrip dynamometry. Int J Exerc Sci. 2008a;1:4-13.

Jackson AS, Pollock ML. Generalized equations for predicting body density of men. Br J Nutr. 1978;40:497-504.

Siri WE. Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. Nutrition. 1993;9:480-491.

-Mogk JP, Keir PJ. Crosstalk in surface electromyography of the proximal forearm during gripping tasks. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003;13:63-71.

Leijnse JN, Campbell-Kyureghyan NH, Spektor D et al. Assessment of individual finger muscle activity in the extensor digitorum communis by surface EMG. J Neurophysiol. 2008;100:3225-3235.

Knutson LM, Soderberg GL, Ballantyne BT et al. A study of various normalization procedures for within day electromyographic data. J Electromyography Kinesiol. 1994;4:47-59.

Koukoubis TD, Cooper LW, Glisson RR et al. An electromyographic study of arm muscles during climbing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1995;3:121-124.

Kisner C, Colby LA. Exercícios terapêuticos – fundamentos e técnicas. São Paulo: Manole; 2005.

Watts PB. Physiology of difficult rock climbing. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;96:361-372.

Quaine F, Martin L, Blanchi JP. The effect of body position and number of supports on wall reaction forces in rock climbing. J Appl Biomech. 1995;13:14-23.

Watts PB, Newbury V, Sulentic J. Acute changes in handgrip strength, endurance, and blood lactate with sustained sport rock climbing. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1996;36:255-260.

Published

2022-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sebold, S. ., Brasil, B. ., Alberton, C. L. ., Pinto, S. S. ., & Kruel, L. F. M. . (2022). Neuromuscular responses during different hand positions in indoor rock climbing. Brazilian Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 36, e36207112. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-4690.2022e36207112