Reflecting differences: ontological turn and ethnographic issues

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9133.v30i2pe181847

Keywords:

Ontological turn, Anthropological theory, Alterity, Difference

Abstract

A current set of anthropologists has been arguing in support of the so-called “ontological turn” in order to deal with the epistemological problems faced by the relationships between ethnographic materials and analytical concepts. According to these authors, the ontological turn is a technology of description that takes the difference seriously and allows our ethnographic materials to dictate the rules of our reflection. I propose a reading that questions whether the ontological turn in anthropology would not be taking its theoretical assumptions so seriously, instead of valuing ethnography itself. Although the approach may bring new relevant topics, it still presents several problems that proponents are not considering. Thus, I conclude that ontological turn proposes new insights to guide anthropologists, but it does not exhaust the ethnography.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALMEIDA, Mauro. 2013. Caipora e outros conflitos ontológicos. In: R@U, v.1: p. 7-28.

AMANTE, Victor. 2019. Tradição ou invenção: a projeção do perspectivismo ameríndio no cenário de sua crítica e da virada ontológica. Monografia (Graduação em Ciências Sociais) – Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas.

BESSIRE, Lucas; BOND, David. 2014. Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique. In: American Ethnologist, v. 41, n. 3: p.440-456. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12083

BOWKER; Geoffrey; STAR, Susan. 2000. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.

CANDEA, Matei. Endo/exo. 2011. In: Common knowledge, vol.17, n.1: p.146-150. DOI https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-2010-046

CLIFFORD, James; MARCUS, George. 1986. Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.

CORRÊA, Mariza. 2013. Traficantes do simbólico e outros ensaios sobre a história da antropologia. Campinas: Editora da UNICAMP.

DE LA CADENA, Marisol; BLASER, Mario. 2018. A world of many worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.

GRAEBER, David. 2015. Radical alterity is just another way of saying "reality": A reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. In: HAU, vol.5, n.2: p.1-41. DOI https://doi.org/10.14318/hau5.2.003

HALLOWELL, Alfred. 1960. Ojibwa ontology, behavior and word view. In: DIAMOND, Stanley (Ed.). Culture in History: essays in honor of Paul Radin. New York: Columbia University Press, p.19-52.

HENARE, Amiria, HOLBRAAD, Martin; WASTELL, Sari. 2007. Thinking through things: theorizing artefacts ethnographically. New York: Routledge.

HEYWOOD, Paolo. 2012. Anthropology and what there is: reflections on ‘ontology’. In: The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, v.30, n.1: p.143-151. DOI https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2012.300112

HOLBRAAD, Martin. 2009. Ontography and Alterity: defining anthropological truth. In: Social Analysis, vol.53, n.2: p.80-93. DOI https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2009.530205

HOLBRAAD, Martin; PEDERSEN, Morten. 2017. The ontological turn: an anthropological exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

KOHN, Eduardo. 2013. How Forests Think: Toward An Anthropology Beyond the Human. Berkeley: University of California Press.

_______. 2015. Anthropology of ontologies. In: Annual Review of Anthropology, vol.44: p.311-327. DOI https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014127

KOPENAWA, Davi; ALBERT, Bruce. 2019. A queda do céu: palavras de um xamã yanomami. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.

LAIDLAW, James. 2012. Ontologically challenged. Anthropology of This Century, vol.4.

LAIDLAW, James; HEYWOOD, Paolo. 2013. One more turn and you’re there. Anthropology of This Century, vol.7.

LATOUR, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the social: an introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

LAW, John. 2004. After method: mess in social science research. London and New York: Routledge.

LEBNER, Ashley. 2017. Redescribing relations: strathernian conversations on ethnography, knowledge and politics. New York: Berghahn Books.

MALINOWSKI, Bronislaw. 2018 [1922]. Argonautas do Pacífico Ocidental: um relato do empreendimento e da aventura dos nativos nos arquipélagos da Nova Guiné Melanésia. São Paulo: Ubu Editora.

MOL, Annemarie. 1999. Ontological politics: a word and some questions. In: The Sociological Review, vol.47, n.1: p.74-89. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x

_______. 2002. The body multiple: ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press.

MOSKO, Mark. 2017. Ways of Baloma: Rethinking magic and kinship from the Trobriands. Chicago: Hau Books.

PACHECO DE OLIVEIRA, João. 1998. Uma etnologia dos ‘índios misturados’? Situação colonial, territorialização e fluxos culturais”. In: Mana, vol.4, n.1: p.47-77. DOI https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-93131998000100003

PEDERSEN, Morten. 2012. Common nonsense: a review of certain recent reviews of the ‘ontological turn’. Anthropology of This Century, v. 5.

RAMOS, Alcida. 2012. The Politics of Perspectivism. In: Annual Review of Anthropology, v. 41, n. 1, pp. 481-494. DOI https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145950

RIBEIRO, Gustavo; ESCOBAR, Artur. 2012. Antropologias mundiais: transformações da disciplina em sistemas de poder. Brasília: Editora da UnB.

STRATHERN, Marilyn. 2004. Partial connections. Update edition. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.

_______. 2017[1980]. Sem natureza, sem cultura: o caso Hagen. In: STRATHERN, Marilyn. O efeito etnográfico e outros ensaios. São Paulo: Ubu Editora, p.23-78.

TODD, Zoe. 2016. An Indigenous Feminist's Take On The Ontological Turn: 'Ontology' Is Just Another Word For Colonialism. In: Journal of Historical Sociology, vol.29, n.1: p.4-22. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12124

VIGH, Henrik; SAUSDAL, David. 2014. From essence back to existence: Anthropology beyond the ontological turn. In: Anthropological Theory, vol.4, n.1: p.49-73. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1463499614524401

VIVEIROS DE CASTRO, Eduardo. 1992. O mármore e a murta. In: Revista de Antropologia, vol.35: p.21-74. DOI https://doi.org/10.11606/2179-0892.ra.1992.111318

_______. 2002. O nativo relativo. In: Mana, vol.8, n.1: p.113-148. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-93132002000100005

_______. 2004. Perspectival anthropology and the method of controlled equivocation. Tipití, vol.2, n.1: p.3-22.

_______. 2012. ‘Transformação’ na antropologia, transformação da ‘antropologia’. In: Mana, vol.18, n.1: p.151-171. DOI https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-93132012000100006

_______. 2015. Who is Afraid of the Ontological Wolf? Some comments on an Ongoing Anthropological Debate. In: The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, vol.33, n.1: p.2-17. DOI https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2015.330102

_______. 2017. Perspectivismo e multinaturalismo na América indígena. In: _______. A inconstância da alma selvagem e outros ensaios de antropologia. São Paulo: Ubu Editora, p.301-346.

_______. 2018. Metafísicas canibais: elementos para uma antropologia pós-estrutural. São Paulo: Ubu Editora, n-1 edições.

WAGNER, Roy. 2017 [1975]. A invenção da cultura. São Paulo: Ubu Editora.

WILLERSLEV, Rane. 2013. Taking Animism Seriously, but Perhaps Not Too Seriously? Religion & Society, vol.4, n.1: p.41-57. DOI https://doi.org/10.3167/arrs.2013.040103

WINNER, Langdon. 1980. Do artifacts have politics? In: Daedalus, vol.109, n.1: p.121-136. DOI https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315259697-21

WOOLGAR, Steve; LEZAUN, Javier. 2013. The wrong big bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies? In: Social Studies of Science, vol.43, n.3: p.321-340. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713488820

Published

2021-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles and Essays

How to Cite

Puga, F. (2021). Reflecting differences: ontological turn and ethnographic issues. Cadernos De Campo (São Paulo, 1991), 30(2), e181847. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9133.v30i2pe181847

Funding data