Kierkegaard antimodern, or towards an alternative typology for the kierkegaardian sociopolitical position

Authors

  • Gabriel Guedes Rossatti Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v20i1p163-178

Keywords:

Kierkegaard, modernity, antimoderns, moralists, democracy

Abstract

Kierkegaard, notwithstanding his reputation as a major nineteenth century thinker, up to this day suffers in the hands of his interpreters, particularly the ones interested in his sociopolitical thought. Indeed, many of them still seem to cling to the view according to which he would have been a conservative, if not a downright reactionary writer. In this sense, taking as a cue the label “antimodern” as developed by Compagnon, I intend to both discern different topoi in his production, as well as more fundamentally propose a different label for his sociopolitical position, viz, antimodern

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ADORNO, T. W. Kierkegaard: construção do estético. In: ADORNO, T. W. Kierkegaard: construção do estético. Tradução de Alvaro Valls. São Paulo: Ed. UNESP, 2010, pp. 19-307.

BAUDELAIRE, C. Correspondance I. PICHOIS, C. (ed.). Paris: Gallimard, coll. Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1973.

BENJAMIN, W. The Paris of the Second Empire in Baudelaire. In: BENJAMIN, W. The Writer of Modern Life. JENNINGS, M. W. (ed.). Cambridge, MA and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006, pp. 46-133.

COMPAGNON, A. Les antimodernes: de Joseph de Maistre à Roland Barthes. Paris: Gallimard, 2005.

HADOT, P. La figure de Socrate. In: HADOT, P. Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique. Paris: Albin Michel, 2002, pp. 101-141.

KAHAN, A. S. Aristocratic liberalism: the social and political thought of Jacob Burkhardt, John Stuart Mill, and Alexis de Tocqueville. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2001.

KIERKEGAARD, S. Søren Kierkegaards Skrifter. Udgivet af Niels Jørgen Cappelørn et al., København: Gads Forlag, 1997–2013 (55 volumes).

KIRMMSE, B. ‘But I am almost never understood...’ Or, Who Killed Søren Kierkegaard?. In: PATTISON, G. & SHAKESPEARE, S. (eds.). Kierkegaard: the self in society. MacMillan Press, 1998, pp. 165-178.

KOSELLECK, R. Crítica e crise: uma contribuição à patogênese do mundo burguês. Tradução de Luciana V.-B. Castelo-Branco. Rio de Janeiro: UERJ; Contraponto, 1999.

LAFOND, J. Préface. In: Moralistes du XVIIe Siècle. Éd. J. Lafond. Paris: Robert Laffont, 1992, pp. I-XLIX.

________. La Rochefoucauld: le moraliste et l’Idiot. In: LAFOND, J. L’homme et son image. Morales et littérature de Montaige à Mandeville. Paris: Honoré Champion, 1996, pp. 305-26.

MAISTRE, J. de. Considérations sur la France. In: MAISTRE, J. de. Œuvres. GLAUDES, P. (ed.). Paris: Robert Laffont, 2007, pp. 199-289.

________. Éclaircissement sur les sacrifices. In: MAISTRE, J. de. Œuvres. Glaudes, P. (ed.). Paris: Robert Laffont, 2007, pp. 805-839.

NICOLETTI, M. Politics and Religion in Kierkegaard’s thought: Secularization and the Martyr. In: CONNELL, G. B.; EVANS, C. S. (orgs.). Foundations of Kierkegaard’s Vision of Community. Religion, Ethics, and Politics in Kierkegaard. New Jersey and London: Humanities Press, 1992, pp. 183-195.

ORTEGA Y GASSET, J. La Rebelión de las Masas. In: ORTEGA Y GASSET, J. Obras Completas, tomo IV (1926-1931). Madrid: Taurus, 2005, pp. 347-528.

PATTISON, G. ‘Poor Paris!’. Kierkegaard’s Critique of the Spectacular City. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1999.

____________. The sublime, the city and the present age. In: PATTISON, G. Kierkegaard, religion and the nineteenth-century crisis of culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 1-24.

ROSSATTI, G.G. O conceito de modernidade nos escritos primeiros de Kierkegaard: uma análise semântico-conceitual. 2012. 205f. Tese (Doutorado). Programa de Pós-Graduação Interdisciplinar em Ciências Humanas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 2012.

_________. The Present Age. In: EMMANUEL, S.; MCDONALD, W. AND STEWART, J. (orgs). Kierkegaard’s Concepts, tome V. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2015, pp. 113-120.

_________. Revolution. In: EMMANUEL, S.; MCDONALD, W. AND STEWART, J. (orgs). Kierkegaard’s Concepts, tome V. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2015, pp. 245-253.

SLØK, J. Da Kierkegaard tav: Fra forfatterskab til kirkestorm. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag, 1980.

TOCQUEVILLE, A. de. La Démocratie en Amérique I. In: Œuvres II. JARDIN, A. (ed.) et. al. Paris: Gallimard, 1992, pp. 3-506.

VAN DELFT, L. Les moralistes. Une apologie. Paris: Gallimard, 2008.

VERGOTE, H.-B. Sens et répétition. Essai sur l’ironie kierkegaardienne, t. I & II. Paris: Cerf/Orante, 1982.

WESTPHAL, M. Society, Politics, and Modernity. In: LIPPIT, J.; PATTISON, G. (orgs). The Oxford Handbook of Kierkegaard. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 310-327.

Published

2015-06-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kierkegaard antimodern, or towards an alternative typology for the kierkegaardian sociopolitical position. (2015). Cadernos De Filosofia Alemã: Crítica E Modernidade, 20(1), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v20i1p163-178