Formal and semantic structure of the self-genealogical argument in Nietzsche
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v20i2p105-119Keywords:
genealogy, self-genealogy, interrogative praxis, self-stagingAbstract
This paper aims to analyze the formal and semantic structure of what I call as self-genealogical argument in Nietzsche, culminating with a brief outline of its form of communicability. From a formal point of view, the concept of genealogy must be understood from its critical register, in necessary connection to an interrogative praxis feeder of a methodical distancing; from a semantic point of view, my hypothesis is that precisely that which was elaborated by Nietzsche until 1887 in Zur Genealogie der Moral, thought especially in the view of culture, is realized in the 1888 texts, now in the view of himself. I finish with a brief and plausible sense of self-staging, insofar as Nietzsche converts himself into an argumentative instance, especially in Ecce homo.Downloads
References
BENNE, C.; MÜLLER, E. Ohnmacht des Subjekts – Macht der Persönlichkeit. Basel: Schwabe Verlag, 2014.
Born, M. „Nietzsches rhetorische Inszenierung der Psychologie“. In: GEORG, J.; ZITTEL, C. (Hrsg.). Nietzsches Philosophie des Unbewussten. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2012, pp.197-206.
Detering, H. Der Antichrist und der Gekreuzigte. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2010.
Görner, R. Wenn Götzen dämmern. Formen ästhetischen Denkens bei Nietzsche. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck& Ruprecht, 2008.
KAULBACH, F. Nietzsches Idee einer Experimentalphilosophie. Köhl/Wien: Böhlau, 1980.
LOSSI, A. „Philosophie als Selbstgestaltung? Umwertung und Selbstverständnis im Ausgang von Nietzsches von den ‚Vorurtheilen der Philosophen‘ in Jenseits von Gut und Böse“. In: BORN, M.;PICHLER, A. (Hrsg.). Texturen des Denkens. Nietzsches Inszenierung der Philosophie in Jenseits von Gut und Böse. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2013, pp.107-122.
Müller, E.Von der Umwerthung zur Autogenealogie. Die Götzen-Dämmerung im Kontext des Spätwerks. In: GERHARDT, V.; RESCHKE, R. (Hg.): Nietzsche im Film- Projektionen und Götzen-Dämmerung, Nietzscheforschung, 16, 2008, pp.141–149.
NIETZSCHE, F. Sämtliche Werke. Kritische Studienausgabe in 15 Bänden. (KSA) Hrsg. Giorgio Colli und MazzinoMontinari. Berlin/New York: DTV & Walter de Gruyter, 1999.
Rupschus, A. Nietzsches Problem mit den Deutschen. Wagners Deutschtum und Nietzsches Philosophie. (Monographien und Texte zur Nietzsche-Forschung). Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2013.
Saar, M. Genealogie als Kritik. Geschichte und Theorie des Subjekts nach Nietzsche und Foucault. Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag, 2007.
Sommer, A. Nietzsche-Kommentar. Der Fall Wagner, Götzen-Dämmerung. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2012.
Stegmaier, W. Nietzsches „Genealogie der Moral“, Darmstadt: WGB, 1994.
___________. „Anti-Lehren. Szene und Lehre in Nietzsches ‚Also sprach Zarathustra‘“. In: GERHARDT, V. (Hg.). Also sprach Zarathustra, (Klassiker Auslegen). Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2000, pp.191-224.
___________. Nietzsches Befreiung der Philosophie. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2012.
___________. “A crítica de Nietzsche da razão da sua vida: para uma interpretação de O anticristo e Ecce homo”. In: ___ As linhas fundamentais do pensamento de Nietzsche. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2013, pp.65-90.
TONGEREN, P. „Vom ‘Arzt der Kultur’ zum ‘Arzt und Kranken in einer Person’“. In: SOMMER, A. (Hrsg.). Nietzsche, Philosoph der Kultur(en)?, Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2008, pp.11-29.
___________. A moral da crítica de Nietzsche à moral. Estudo sobre “Para além de bem e mal”. Tradução de Jorge L. Viesenteiner. Curitiba: Champagnat, 2012.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Information and conceptions on the texts are complete responsibility of the authors.
All the articles submitted before July 5th 2018 and those published after July 2021 are licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND license – except those published between the aforementioned dates, which are under the CC BY-NC-SA license. The permission for the translation of the material published under the license CC BY-NC-ND by third parts can be obtained with the consent of the author.
Open access policies - Diadorim
Rules applied before July 5th 2018:
Presenting a submission to our Editorial Board implies granting priority of publication for “Cadernos de filosofia alemã”, as well as transferring the copyright of texts (once published), which will be reproduced only with the manifest authorization of the editors. Authors keep the right to reuse the texts published in future editions of their work, without paying any fees to "Cadernos”. We will not grant the permission to re-edit or translate the texts for third parts without agreement of the author.
