Hannah Arendt and the “conservative revolution”: philosophy, revolution and modernity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v21i3p51-66Keywords:
romanticism, existencialism, conservative revolution.Abstract
This article aims to analyze Arendt's critique of romantic readers of Kant, as it develops in the article "What is Existential Philosophy" (1946). This review is a fundamental key to understanding not only the philosophical principles of her criticism of political existentialism, especially those held by Heidegger, but also to some of the problems that lead directly to her work of the fifties, and underlying it.Downloads
References
Arendt, H. (1982). Lectures on Kant’ Political Philosophy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
___________. (1990). On Revolution. Londres: Penguin Books.
___________. (2005a). “French Existencialism” (1946). In: Essays in Understanding, 1930-1954. New York: Schocken Books.
___________. (2005b). “Friedrich von Gentz” (1932). In: Essays in Understanding, 1930-1954. New York: Schocken Books.
___________. (2005c). “What is Existencial Philosophy?” (1946). In: Essays in Understanding, 1930-1954. New York: Schocken Books.
___________. (2005d).“Concern with the Politics in Recent European Philosophical Thought” (1954). In: Essays in Understanding, 1930-1954. New York: Schocken Books.
Benhabib, S. (1996). The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt. Boston: Altamira Press.
Bernstein, R. (1997). Provocation and Appropriation: Hannah Arendt’s Response to Martin Heidegger. Constellations, 4(2), pp.153-171.
Heidegger, M. (1999). Sein und Zeit. 2.ed. Frankfurt: V. Klostermann.
Jay, M. (2000). “El existencialismo político de Hannah Arendt” Traducción de J. Calvo Perales. En: F. Birules (comp.). El orgullo del pensar. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Tassin, E. (2012). “Caton et les invictorieux. La cause vaincue». En : Le maléfice de la vie á plusieurs. La politique est-elle vouée á l´échec?. La Rochelle: Bayard.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Information and conceptions on the texts are complete responsibility of the authors.
All the articles submitted before July 5th 2018 and those published after July 2021 are licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND license – except those published between the aforementioned dates, which are under the CC BY-NC-SA license. The permission for the translation of the material published under the license CC BY-NC-ND by third parts can be obtained with the consent of the author.
Open access policies - Diadorim
Rules applied before July 5th 2018:
Presenting a submission to our Editorial Board implies granting priority of publication for “Cadernos de filosofia alemã”, as well as transferring the copyright of texts (once published), which will be reproduced only with the manifest authorization of the editors. Authors keep the right to reuse the texts published in future editions of their work, without paying any fees to "Cadernos”. We will not grant the permission to re-edit or translate the texts for third parts without agreement of the author.
