The money of spirit: idealism and the critique of political economy in the young Marx
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v23i1p79-94Keywords:
Marx, critique of political economy, idealism, dialecticsAbstract
The aim of the article is to present an interpretation of the theoretical status of the critique of political economy of the young Marx. For this, it privileges the so-called Economic-philosophical manuscripts and Excerpts from the James Mill’s Book “Éléments d’économie politique”. In this context, this article seeks to clarify the mutually constitutive relation that Marx saw between political economy, Hegel’s idealism and the capitalist society. It is sustained the idea that this relation defines the general theoretical meaning of the author’s project of critique of political economy, as well as the notions of critique and dialectics employed there.
Downloads
References
Adorno, T. W. (2007). Três estudos sobre Hegel. Tradução de Ulisses Razzante Vaccari. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.
Arthur, C. (1986). Dialectics of labour: Marx and his relation with Hegel. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Backhaus, H-G. (1997). Dialektik der Wertform: Untersuchungen zur Marxschen Ökonomiekritik. Freiburg: Ça ira.
Breckman, W. (1999). Marx, the Young Hegelians, and the origins of radical social theory: dethroning the self. New York: Cambridge Press University.
Colletti, L. (1975). “Introduction”. In: Marx’s Early Writings. New York: Penguin Books.
Fausto. R. (1980). Sobre o jovem Marx. Discurso, 1(13), pp.7-52.
Feuerbach, L. (1988). Princípios da filosofia do futuro e outros escritos. Tradução de Artur Morão. Lisboa: Edições 70.
____________. (2012). Para a crítica da filosofia de Hegel. Tradução de Adriana Veríssimo Serrão. São Paulo: LiberArs.
Giannotti, J. A. (1985). Origens da dialética do trabalho: estudos sobre a lógica do jovem Marx. 2ª ed. Porto Alegre.
____________. (2011). Entrevista com José Arthur Giannotti. Trans/Form/Ação, 34, Edição Especial, pp.15-23.
Habermas, J. (2002). O discurso filosófico da modernidade: doze lições. Tradução Luiz Sérgio Repa e Rodnei Nascimento. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2016). Ciência da lógica: 1. A doutrina do ser. Tradução Christian Iber et al. Petrópolis: Vozes / Ed. Universitária São Francisco.
Jappe, A. (2014). Alienação, reificação e fetichismo da mercadoria. Limiar, 1 (2), pp.4-29.
Löwith, K. (2014). De Hegel a Nietzsche: a ruptura revolucionária no pensamento do século XIX: Marx e Kierkegaard. Tradução de Flamarion C. Ramos e Luiz Fernando B. Martin. São Paulo: Editora UNESP.
Marx, K. (1982). Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte. In: MEGA² I.2: Werke, Artikel, Entwürfe. März 1843 bis August 1844. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, pp.323-438.
____________. (2004). Manuscritos econômico-filosóficos. Tradução de Jesus Ranieri. São Paulo: Boitempo.
____________. (2016). Excertos do livro de James Mill “Éléments d’économie politique”. Tradução de Luiz Philipe de Caux. Cadernos de Filosofia Alemã, 21, (1), pp.147-161.
Murray, P. (1988). Marx’s Theory of Scientific Knowledge. New Jersey: Humanities Press International.
____________. (2009). “Value, Money and Capital in Hegel and Marx”. In: Chitty, A. e McIvor, M. (orgs.). Karl Marx and Contemporary Philosophy. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.
Musto, M. (2009). Marx in Paris: Manuscripts and notebooks of 1844. Science & Society, 73(3), pp.386-402. Doi: 10.1521/siso.2009.73.3.386.
Rancière, J. (1979). “O conceito de crítica e a crítica da economia política dos Manuscritos de 1844 a O capital”. In: Ler O capital. Tradução de Nathanael C. Caixeiro. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
Renault, E (org.). (2008). Lire les Manuscrits de 1844. Paris: PUF.
Serrano, B. (2016). Jovem Marx: crítica da economia política como crítica do trabalho. Peri, 8 (1), pp.45-61. Recuperado de: http://www.nexos.ufsc.br/index.php/peri/article/view/1300/842. Acesso em: 02 nov. 2017.
Winfield, R. (1988). The Just Economy. New York/London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Information and conceptions on the texts are complete responsibility of the authors.
All the articles submitted before July 5th 2018 and those published after July 2021 are licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND license – except those published between the aforementioned dates, which are under the CC BY-NC-SA license. The permission for the translation of the material published under the license CC BY-NC-ND by third parts can be obtained with the consent of the author.
Open access policies - Diadorim
Rules applied before July 5th 2018:
Presenting a submission to our Editorial Board implies granting priority of publication for “Cadernos de filosofia alemã”, as well as transferring the copyright of texts (once published), which will be reproduced only with the manifest authorization of the editors. Authors keep the right to reuse the texts published in future editions of their work, without paying any fees to "Cadernos”. We will not grant the permission to re-edit or translate the texts for third parts without agreement of the author.
