The Subject of the “Transcendental Doctrine of Method”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v24i1p83-99Keywords:
Transcendental Doctrine of Method, Critique of Pure Reason, Metaphysics, DefinitionsAbstract
In this paper, it is argued that the “Transcendental Doctrine of Method” is a text in that Kant examines the formal conditions of Metaphysics. In this section, he does not develop any methodological indication for the Critique of Pure Reason, which is a propaedeutic, but for the system of pure reason. Secondly, by the study of an indication presented in the “Transcendental Doctrine of Method”, it is shown that, although this doctrine is not supposed to specify the critical methodology, the development of the Kantian text is actually coherent with it.
Downloads
References
Allison, H. (1983). Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. An Interpretation and Defense, New Haven- London: Yale University Press.
Brandt, R. (1998). “Transzendentale Ästhetik, §§1-3”. En: Mohr, Willaschek (eds.), Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Berlín: Akademie-Verlag.
Caimi, M. (1996). About the Argumentative Structure of the Transcendental Aesthetic. Studi Kantiani, IX, pp. 27-46.
____________. (2012). Application of the Doctrine of Method in the critical examination of reason. Studia Kantiana, 13, pp. 5–16.
Chenet, F.-X. (1994). L’assise de l’ontologie critique: l’Esthétique Transcendentale. Lille: Presses Universitaires.
Cohen, H. (1989). Kommentar zu Immanuel Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hildesheim, Zürich, New York: Olms Verlag.
Conrad, E. (1994). Kants Logikvorlesungen als neuer Schlüssel zur Architektonik der Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Die Ausarbeitung der Gliederungsentwürfe in den Logikvorlessungen als Auseinandersetzung mit der Tradition. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.
Heimsoeth, H. (1966). Transzendentale Dialektik. Ein Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Berlín: Walter de Gruyter & Co, Tomo IV.
Irrlitz, G. (2010). Kant-Handbuch. Leben und Werk. Stuttgart, Weimar: J. B. Metzler Verlag.
Kant, I. (1900ss.). Kants gesammelte Schriften herausgegeben von der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (antes: Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
____________. (2009). Crítica de la razón pura. Traducción de Mario Caimi. Buenos Aires: Colihue.
Kemp Smith, N. (1918). A Commentary to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. London: Macmillan.
Lambert, J. H. (2008). „Über die Methode, die Metaphysik, Theologie und Moral richtiger zu beweisen“. Philosophische Schriften, Band X: Philosophische Schriften, Entwürfe und Rezensionen aus dem Nachlaß. Teilband 2. Hildesheim-Zürich-New York: Georg Olms Verlag.
La Rocca, C. (2003). “Istruzioni per costruire. La Dottrina del metodo della prima Critica”. En: Soggetto e mondo. Studi su Kant, Venezia, Marsilio, pp. 183-215.
Loparic, Z. (2000). A semântica transcendental de Kant. Campinas: UNICAMP.
Martínez, L. (2017). ¿Por qué no es posible definir las categorías, de acuerdo con la Crítica de la razón pura?. Kant E-Prints, 12(3), pp. 6–18.
Michel, K. (2003). Untersuchungen zur Zeitkonzeption in Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Berlin- New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Mohr, G. (1998). “Transzendentale Ästhetik, §§4-8”. En: Mohr, Willaschek (eds.). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Berlín: Akademie-Verlag.
Paton, H. (1936). Kant’s Metaphysic of Experience. London-New York.
Rohs, P. (1998). “Die Disziplin der reinen Vernunft. 1. Abschnitt (A707/ B735-A738/ B 766)”. En: Mohr, Willaschek (eds.). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Berlín: Akademie-Verlag.
Tonelli, G. (1994). Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason within the Tradition of Modern Logic. Hildesheim-Zürich-New York: Georg Olms Verlag.
Torretti, R. (1980). Manuel Kant. Estudio sobre los fundamentos de la filosofía crítica, Buenos Aires: Charcas.
Trevisan, D. (2014). Sentidos de metafísica na filosofia crítica de Kant. Studia Kantiana, 17, pp. 104–125.
____________. (2018). Der Gerichtshof der Vernunft. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Vaihinger, H. (1982). Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Stuttgart.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Information and conceptions on the texts are complete responsibility of the authors.
All the articles submitted before July 5th 2018 and those published after July 2021 are licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND license – except those published between the aforementioned dates, which are under the CC BY-NC-SA license. The permission for the translation of the material published under the license CC BY-NC-ND by third parts can be obtained with the consent of the author.
Open access policies - Diadorim
Rules applied before July 5th 2018:
Presenting a submission to our Editorial Board implies granting priority of publication for “Cadernos de filosofia alemã”, as well as transferring the copyright of texts (once published), which will be reproduced only with the manifest authorization of the editors. Authors keep the right to reuse the texts published in future editions of their work, without paying any fees to "Cadernos”. We will not grant the permission to re-edit or translate the texts for third parts without agreement of the author.
Funding data
-
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Grant numbers 777786
