A Interpretação Aristotélica do Pensamento Protagoreano em Metafísica Γ 4-6
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v11i2p82-105Keywords:
Metafísica, Aristotle, Protagoras, Aristóteles, Theaetetus, non-contradiction, princípio de não contradição,Abstract
In Metaphysics Γ 4-6 Aristotle argues that Protagoras is committed not just to denying the PNC, but also to asserting its contrary. In this paper, I offer an analysis of this commitment. I try to show that Aristotle is working with a specific idea in mind: a Protagoreanism ontologically linked to the flux doctrine, as Plato suggested in Theaetetus 152-160.
Downloads
References
Angioni, L. 1999. Princípio de Não-Contradição e Semântica da Predicação em Aristóteles, Analytica, vol. 4, n. 2,
Angioni, L. 2006. Introdução à Teoria da Predicação. Campinas: Editora Unicamp.
Angioni, L. 2007. Metafísica de Aristóteles: livros VII-VIII. Tradução. Campinas: Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas.
Boghossian, P. 2012. Medo do Conhecimento: Contra o Relativismo e o Construtivismo. São Paulo: editora Senac.
Borges, A. P. 2012. Fluxo e Infalibilismo em Teeteto 151-160, Journal of Ancient Philosophy, vol. 6, nº 2, 1-30.
Bostock. D. 1988. Plato’s Theaetetus. Oxford, OUP https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198239307.001.0001
Burnyeat, M. F. 1976. Protagoras and Self-Refutation in Later Greek Philosophy, Philosophical Review 84, 44-69. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511974052.003
Burnyeat, M. F. The Theaetetus of Plato. 1990. Indianapolis-Cambridge: Hackett.
Cassin, B., & Narcy, M. (ed.). 1989. La décision du Sens: Le livre Gamma de la Métaphysique d’Aristote. Introduction, texte, traduction et commentaire. Paris: Vrin.
Code, A. 1986. Aristotle’s Investigation of a Basic Logical Principle: Which Science Investigates the Principle of Non-Contradiction? Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 16, N. 3, 341-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1986.10717123
Cornford, F. M. 2003 [1935]. Plato’s Theory of Knowledge. Mineola-NY: Dover,
Crubelier, M. 2008. La Tactique Argumentative de Métaphysique Gamma 3-6. Em: Stevens, A., 2008, p. 379-402.
Duke, E. A. et al. (eds). 1995. Platonis Opera: volume I. Oxford, OUP.
Erginel, M. 2009. Relativism and Self-Refutation in the Theaetetus, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 36: 1-45.
Gottlieb. P. 1994. The Principle of Non-Contradiction and Protagoras: The Strategy of Aristotle's Metaphysics IV 4, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, vol. 8, 183–209.
Hestir, B. 2016. Plato on the Metaphysical Foundation of Meaning and Truth. New York-Cambridge: CUP. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316450864
Irwin, T. 1988. Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford-New York, OUP.
Keeling, E. 2013. Aristotle, Protagoras, and Contradiction, Journal of Ancient Philosophy, v. 7, n. 2, 75-99. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198242905.001.0001
Kirwan, C. 1993. Aristotle’s Metaphysics Books Γ, Δ, and Oxford-New York: Clarendon Press.
Lee, M-K. 2005. Epistemology After Protagoras: Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle, and Democritus. Oxford: OUP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199262225.001.0001
McCready-Flora, I. 2015. Protagoras and Plato in Aristotle: Rereading the Measure Doctrine, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, vol. 49, 71-127.
McDowell, J. 1973. Plato: Theaetetus. Oxford: OUP.
Moreira, V. C. 2015. Observações Sobre a Estrutura da Significação em Metafísica Γ 4, Journal of Ancient Philosophy, vol. 9, n. 1, 22-40.
Polansky, R. M. 1992. Philosophy and Knowledge: A Commentary on Plato’s Theaetetus. Lewisburg: BUP.
Politis, V. 2004. Aristotle and the Metaphysics. London-New York: Routledge.
Reeve, C. D. C. 2016. Aristotle Metaphysics. Indianapolis-Cambridge.
Ross, W. D. 1924. Aristotle: Metaphysics Volume I, A Revised Text With Introduction and Commentary. Oxford, Clarendon.
Rowe, C. 2015. Plato: Theaetetus and Sophist. Cambridge: CUP. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139047036
Sayre, K., Plato’s Analytic Method. Chicago-London, UCP: 1969
Stevens, A. (org). 2008. Aristote. Métaphysique Gamma: Édition, Traduction, Études. Introduction, texte grec et traduction par M. Hecquet-Devienne. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.
Van Ophuijsen, J. M, Van Raalte, M. & Storck, P. (eds.) 2013. Protagoras of Abdera: the man, his measure. Leiden-Boston, Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004251243
Waterlow, S. 1977. Protagoras and Inconsistency: Theaetetus 171a6-7, Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie, 59, 19-36 https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.1977.59.1.19
Wedin, M. 2003. A Curious Turns in Metaphysics Gamma: Protagoras and Strong Denial of the Principle of Non-Contradiction, Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie, 85, 107-130. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.2003.007
Wedin, M. 2004. On the Use and Abuse of Non-contradiction: Aristotle Critique of Protagoras and Heraclitus in Metaphysics Gamma 5. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosphy, vol. 26, 213-239.
Zillig, R. 2007. Significação e Não Contradição: o Papel da Noção de Significação na Defesa do Princípio de Não Contradição, Analytica, v. 11, n. 1, 107-126.
Zillioli, U. 2013. Protagoras Through Plato and Aristotle: A Case for the Philosophical Significance of Ancient Relativism. Em: Van Ophuijsen, J. M, Van Raalte, M. & Storck, P. (eds.), 2013, p. 233-258. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004251243_013
Zingano, M. 2003. Notas Sobre o Princípio de Não Contradição em Aristóteles, Cadernos de História e Filosofia da Ciência, Série 3, Vol. 13, nº 1, 7-32.
Zingano, M. 2005. Sobre a Metafísica de Aristóteles: Textos Selecionados. São Paulo: Odysseus.
Zingano, M. 2008. Sêmainein hen, sêmainein kath’ henos et la preuve de 1006b28-34. Em: Stevens, A., 2008, p. 303-421.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).