Women´s Resilience in a popular neighbourhood located in Salvador, Bahia: personal and contextual resources
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19770Keywords:
Resilience, Context, Attachment, Development, FamilyAbstract
This is a qualitative and exploratory study that aim to characterize the personal and contextual resources used by women considered "resilient" for their ability to overcome, in a social positive way, adversities such as: abandonment, violence, unemployment and disease. The study attempts to identify how these women, when they themselves were children and adolescents, perceived and explored their own environment and how this environment in which they grew up in functioned within the world around them and the opportunities it offered. Furthermore, what personal and contextual resources they were able to utilize in this environment. The study chose five participants from a group named "Conversa de família" (Talk about family), located in an Educative Center, in a suburb of Salvador, Bahia. The researchers applied a semi-structured interview about the life history and the sociometric network. The analysis was based on an ecological perspective of human development, which considers the person in context and developmental processes in time, as well as the Psychodramatic approach. The results of the study indicated a "resilience of survival", based on their own performance, where the difficulties were the means for their success as people. The study also revealed the presence of real or imaginary figures, and the importance for these women to have a relational networks, inside and/or outside the family, as well as the possibility for these women of move in this network, so these forms of relationships could functioning as a basis for future relationships. Some common features appeared in the study: confidence in themselves and in their capacity to find viable ways to cope, persistence, a good self image, not to have feelings of resentment and to have a good humor. The supportive networks are present in all histories, making possible for the survival of the original family, and then her own survival and, as adults, they themselves have been the network to her sons, grandsons, godsons, neighbors.References
Vanistendael S. Resiliência: como crescer superando os percalços. Trad. José Claret Leite Cintra. Genebra: Escritório Internacional Católico da Infância; 1997.
Bowlby J. Uma abordagem de sistemas de controle para o comportamento de apego. In: Bowlby J. Apego. 2a ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes; 2002.p. 291-319. v. I (Trilogia: Apego, Separação e Perda).
Rutter M, Rutter M. Developing minds: challenge and continuity across the life span. London: Penguin Books; 1992.
Vasconcellos V, Valsiner J. Perspectiva co-construtivista na psicologia e na educação. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1995.
Bowlby J. Por que as famílias fracassam? In: Bowlby J. Cuidados maternos e saúde mental. São Paulo: Martins Fonte; 1981. p. 79-91.
Moreno J L. Teoria e prática dos papéis. In: Instituto Fernandes Figueira Moreno JL. Psicodrama. 2. ed. São Paulo: Cultrix; 1975. p. 206-30.
Bronfenbrenner U. Elementos do ambiente. In: Bronfenbrenner U. A ecologia do desenvolvimento humano: experimentos naturais e planejados. Tradução de Maria Adriana Veríssimo Veronese. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1996. p. 37-83.
Seligman MEP. Aprenda a ser otimista. Tradução de Alberto Lopes. Rio de Janeiro: Record; 1992.
Lewis M. Alterando o destino: por que o passado não prediz o futuro. Tradução de Dinah de Abreu Azevedo. São Paulo: Moderna; 1999.
Masten AS, Garmezy N. Risk, vulnerability, and protective factors in developmental psychopathology. In: Lahey BB, Kasdin AE (organizadores). Advances in clinical child psychology. vol. 8. New York: Plenum Press; 1985.
Kaloustian S M. (organizador). Família brasileira a base de tudo. 2a ed. São Paulo: Cortez; 1994.
Yunes MAM, Szymanski H. Resiliência: noção, conceitos afins e considerações críticas. In: Tavares J (organizador). Resiliência e educação. São Paulo: Cortez; 2001. p. 13-42.
Walsh F. Strengthening family resilience. New York: The Guilford Press; 1998.
Alvarez AmdS, Moraes MCLd, Rabinovich EP. Resiliência: um estudo com brasileiros institucionalizados. Rev Bras Cresc Desenv Hum 1998; 8(1/2): 70-5.
Bastos ACS. A estruturação cultural da família como contexto de desenvolvimento e a promoção da responsabilidade na criança. In: Bastos AcdS. Modos de partilhar: a criança e o cotidiano da família. Taubaté: Cabral Editora Universitária; 2001. p. 67-117.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis