Children with mental deficiency and interpersonal relationships in a community toy library
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19837Keywords:
Toy, Interpersonal relationships, Children with mental deficiency, Community toy libraryAbstract
Contemporary society has been limiting the play activity of children. Children with mental deficiency also have to face psychosocial barriers. A community toy library can be a place where it is possible to face limitations while playing. The objective was to describe the interpersonal relationships among children with mental deficiency and children without deficiency in a context of community toy library, pointing out how this context can influence these relationships. Basic procedures were a group of children was observed during ten meetings. In this group, two children had mental deficiency. The description of the play situation that involved the issue of deficiency was used as collection focus. Categories of data collection were: type of game, interaction style and its social character. An episode was compared with another involving the same participants, aiming to identify transformation or not of the type of interaction of social or agonistic character. We identified three significant interaction contexts: passage interactions, interactions in parallel games and interactions in games with another child. It seems that the passage interactions potentialized more agonistic interactions, while the parallel games potentialized more pro-social interactions. Situations of school play, fantasies and games seemed to potentialize more pro-social interactions, because of the fact that the members of the group chose the games and their companions. Although games in which all children participated gave visibility and group participation to children with mental deficiency, they showed a larger amount of agonistic and pro-social interactions. As conclusions, Children with mental deficiency have conquered a place. A place to go, to play, to find children, to transform themselves, their relationships and the relationship of the others.References
Winnicott DW. O brincar e a realidade. Rio de Janeiro: Imago; 1975.
Piaget J. A formação do símbolo na criança: imitação, jogo e sonho, imagem e representação. Rio de janeiro: Guanabara-Koogan; 1978.
Vygotsky LS. A formação social da mente. São Paulo: Martins Fontes; 1984.
Parham LD, Fazio SLA. A recreação na Terapia Ocupacional pediátrica. São Paulo: Santos; 2000.
Brasil. Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente. Diário Oficial da União, Lei nº 8.069, de13.07.1990, Brasília. Disponível em: http://www.unicef.org/brazil
Organização Mundial da Saúde. Convenção sobre os direitos da criança; 1989. Disponível em: http://www.unicef.org/brazil/dir_cri.htm
Meira AM. Benjamin, os brinquedos e a infância contemporânea. Psicologia Sociedade 2003; 15(2):74-87.
Benjamin W. Reflexões: a criança, o brinquedo, a educação. São Paulo: Summus; 1984.
Friedmann A. A evolução do brincar. In: Friedmann A. [et al.]. O direito de brincar: a brinquedoteca. São Paulo: Scritta 1992; p.23-31.
Amaral LA. A integração social e suas barreiras: representações culturais do corpo mutilado. Revista de Terapia Ocupacional da Universidade de São Paulo 1991; 2(4):188-95.
Aranha MSF. A interação social e o desenvolvimento de relações interpessoais do deficiente em ambiente integrado[tese]. São Paulo (SP): Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de São Paulo; 1991.
Prado PD. “A gente gosta é de brincar com os outros meninos!”. Relações sociais entre crianças num Jardim de Infância. Educação Sociedade 2005; 26(91):683-8.
Stainback S, Stainback W. Inclusão: Guia para educadores. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas Sul;1999.
Carvalho AM, Alves MMF, Gomes PLD. Brincar e educação: concepções e possibilidades. Psicologia em Estudo. 2005;10(2):217-26
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis