Instruments of evaluation of child development of premature newborns

Authors

  • Naíme Diane Sauaia Holanda Silva Centro Universitário do Maranhão
  • Fernando Lamy Filho Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; Instituto Fernandes Figueira
  • Mônica Elinor Alves Gama Universidade Federal do Maranhão; Programa de Pós - graduação em Saúde Materno-Infantil
  • Zeni de Carvalho Lamy Universidade Federal do Maranhão; Programa de Pós - graduação em Saúde Materno-Infantil
  • André do Lago Pinheiro Universidade Federal do Maranhão
  • Diego do Nascimento Silva Universidade Federal do Maranhão; Pró-Reitoria de Extensão

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19998

Keywords:

prematurity, child development, assessment of child development

Abstract

A significant improvement in neonatal intensive care has caused a reduction in mortality in babies at risk and therefore an increase in its morbidity, which stressed the importance of assessing the development of these children. This review was designed to identify the main instruments indicated to assess the development of preterm infants. The databases used were Medline, Lilacs, SciELO, manuals, tools and books in the field of Pediatrics for presenting details on the instruments and not set time limit, because the research objective was to identify the instruments from ancient to most published recently. We identified 11 instruments for assessing development published from 1947 to 1994. Knowledge of these scales and tests can help health professionals and researchers working on the development of premature children, since they constitute an additional tool in the evaluation process. The choice of instrument of assessment should be conducted in accordance with the needs of each child. Can be used for screening, diagnosis, treatment planning and monitoring.

References

Rugolo, LMSS. Growth and developmental outcomes of the extremely preterm infant. J Pediatr. 2005; 81(1):101-110.

Formiga CKER, Pedrassani ES, Tudella E. Desenvolvimento motor de lactentes pré-termos participantes de um programa de intervenção fisioterapêutica precoce. Rev. Bras. Fisioter. 2004; 8(3): 239-245.

Linhares MBM, Carvalho AEV, Machado C, Martinez FE. Desenvolvimento de bebês nascidos pré-termo no primeiro ano de vida. Paidéia. 2003;13(25):59-72.

Obana AY, Oshiro M. A terapia ocupacional em bebês de risco: reflexos sobre a clínica. Cadernos do Centro Universitário São Camilo. São Paulo. 2002;8(3):58-61.

Almeida KM, Dutra MV, de Mello RR, Reis AB, Martins PS. Concurrent validity and reliability of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in premature infants. J Pediatr (RioJ). 2008;84(5): 442-448.

Santos DCC, Ravanini SG. Aspectos do diagnóstico do desenvolvimento motor. In: Moura MV, Gonçalves VM. Neurologia do desenvolvimento da criança. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter; 2006. p. 258-69.

Francisco RN, Caon G, Bissani C, Silva CA, Sousa M, Silva L. Características neuropsicomotoras de crianças de alto risco neurológico atendidas em um programa de follow up. Pediatria Moderna. 2006;42(2):79-85.

Mancini MC, Teixeira S, de Araújo LG, Paixão ML, Magalhães LC, Coelho ZAC, et al. Estudo do desenvolvimento da função motora aos 8 e a 2 meses de idade, em crianças pré-termo e atermo. Arq. Neuropsiquiatr. 2002;60(4): 974-980.

Gesell, A, Amatruda CS. Diagnóstico do desenvolvimento: avaliação do desenvolvimento neuropsicológico no lactente e na criança pequena: o normal e o patológico. 4th ed. Rio de Janeiro: Atheneu; 2000.

Gesell, A, Ames LB. The development of handiness. J Genet Psychol 1947; 70:155-75.

Ferreira AT, Silva MMA, Silva L, Merighi LBM, Miranda AM, De-Vitto LPM, Lamônica DAC. Desempenho comunicativo em trigêmeos prematuros. Rev CEFAC, São Paulo. 2008;10(1):15-21.

Hage SRV, Joaquim RSS, Carvalho KG, Padovani CR, Guerreiro MM. Diagnóstico de crianças com alterações específicas de linguagem por meio de escala de desenvolvimento. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2004;62(3-A): 649-653.

Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, 1969.

Tecklin JS. Fisioterapia Pediátrica. 3 ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2002.

Bayley, N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development - Second Edition, Administration Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, 1993.

Bayley, N. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - Third Edition, Administration Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, 2006.

Lordelo ER, Chalhub AA, Guirra RC, Carvalho CS. Contexto e desenvolvimento cognitivo: freqüência à creche e evolução do desenvolvimento mental. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica. 2007;20(2):324-334.

Sweeney JK, Swanson MW. Crianças debaixo peso ao nascer: cuidados neonatais e acompanhamento. In: Umphred DA. Reabilitação neurológica. 4ª ed. São Paulo: Manole; 2004. p. 213-71.

Frankenburg WK, Dodds JB. The Denver Developmental Screening Test. J Pediatr. 1967; 71(2): 181-191.

Rezende MA, Beteli VC, Santos JLF. Avaliação de habilidades de linguagem e pessoal-sociais pelo Teste de Denver II em instituições de educação infantil. Acta Paul Enferm. 2005;18(1): 56-63.

Frankenberg WK, Dodds J, Archer P, Shapiro H, Bresnick B.The Denver II: amajor revision and restandardization of Denver developmental screening test. Pediatrics. 1992; 89-91.

Rezende MA, Beteli VC, Santos JLF. Follow-up of the child’s motor abilities inday care centers and pre-schools. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2005; 13(5):619-25.

Souza SC, Leone C, Takano AO, Moratelli HB. Desenvolvimento de pré-escolares na educação infantil em Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Cad. Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro. 2008; 24(8): 1917-1926.

Santos RS, Araújo APQC, Porto MAS. Early diagnosis of abnormal development of preterm newborns: assessment instruments. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008; 84(4):289-299.

Tecklin, JS. Fisioterapia Pediátrica. 3ª ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2002, 479 p.

Umphred DA. Reabilitação Neurológica. 4 ed. Barueri: Manole, 2004. p.475-505.

Effgen SK. Fisioterapia Pediátrica: atendendo as necessidades das crianças. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2007.

Zdanska-Brincken M, Wolanski N. graphic method for evaluation of motor development in infants. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1969; 11(2): 228-41.

Brazelton TB, Nugent JK. Neonatal behavioral assessment scale. 3 ed. London: Mac Keith Press; 1995.

Harris SR, Brady DK. Infant neuromotor assessments instruments: a review. In: Sweeney JK. The high-risk neonate: developmental therapy perspectives. Binhhamton, NY: Haworth Press, 1986. p.135-8.

Lacerda TTB, Magalhães LC. Análise da validade dos itens do Movement Assessment of Infants - MAI - para crianças pré-termo. Rev. Bras. Saúde Matern.Infant. Recife. 2006; 6(3): 297-308.

Schirmer CR, Portuguez MW, Nunes ML. Clinical assessment of language development in children at age 3 years that were born preterm. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2006; 64(4): 926-931.

Salokorpi T, Rajantie I, Kivikko I, Haajanen R, Rajantie, J. Predicting neurological disorders in infants with extremely low birth weight using the movement assessment of infants. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2001;13(3): 106-109.

Dubowitz LMS, Dubowitz V. The neurological assessment of the preterm and full term newborn infant. Clinics in Development Medicine, 79. London: SIMP; 1981.

Barradas J, Fonseca A, Guimarães CL, Lima GM. Relationship between positioning of premature infants in Kangaroo Mother Care and early neuromotor development. J Pediatr (RioJ). 2006; 82: 475-80.

Mello RR, Dutra MVP, Silva KS, Lopes JMA. Valores de predição da avaliação neurológica e ultra-sonográfica cerebral neonatal em relação ao desenvolvimento de prematuros de muito baixo peso. Rev Saúde Púb. 1998; 32(5):420-429.

Folio R, Fewel R. The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (Manual). Astin: Pro Ed, 1983.

Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I, Tjus T, Nekkebroeck J, Squires J, Verté D, Heimann M, et al. Psychological follow-up study of 5-year-old ICSI children. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19(12): 2791-2797.

Campbell SK, Girolami GL, Kolobe THA, Osten ET, Lenke MC. Test of infant motor performance. 3 ed. Chicago: 2001.

Campbell SK, Kolobe TH, Osten ET, Lenke M, Girolami GL. Construct validity of infant motor performance. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1995; 75: 585-586.

Campbell SK. Test-retest reliability of the test of infant motor performance. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1999;11:60-66.

Santos RS, Araújo AP, Porto MA. Early diagnosis of abnormal development of preterm newborns: assessment instruments. J Pediatr. (Rio J). 2008;84(4):289-299.

Piper MC, Darrah JM. Motor Assessment of the Developing Infant. Alberta: WB Saunders, 1994.

Piper MC, Pinnell LE, Darrah J, Maguire T, Byrne PJ. Construction and validation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Can J Public Health.1992; 83(2): 546-550.

Bartlett DJ, Fanning JE. Use of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale to characterize the motor development of infants born preterm at eight months corrected age. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2003; 23(4): 31-45.

Manacero S, Nunes ML. Evaluation of motor performance of preterm new born during the first months of life using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008; 84(1): 53-59.

Vieira MEB, Ribeiro FV, Formiga CKMR. Principais instrumentos de avaliação do desenvolvimento da criança de zero a dois anos de idade. Rev Movimenta. 2009; 2(01): 23-31.

Downloads

Published

2011-04-01

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 1 (2011)

Section

Original Research

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis