AN EXPERIMENT FORMING JUNIOR RESEARCHERS: DISCURSE OF THE COLLECTIVE SUBJECT, ON VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.40170Keywords:
Adolescence. Research. Social Handicap. Cultural Capital. Peda~ogic Strategies.Abstract
This article contains lhe results of an experiment exhibiting lhe develpmental process of Junior Researchers. This experiment was conducted in association with lhe Programa Bolsa e Trabalho, (Scholarship and Work Program), channeled through lhe Secretaria Municipal de Desenvolvimento, (Municipal Developing Department), Trabalho e Soledaridade (Work and Solidarit)and lhe Faculdade de Saude Publica (lhe School of Public Health) at lhe University of São Paulo (USP). Teenagers afina from 16 to 20 years old, who joined lhe programa Bolsa e Trabalho and
this research experiment where capable of acquiring the skills necessary to behave professionally to become Junior Researchers, and thus improve the their employment chances in the future. To achieve these results, it was essential to come up with dynamic pedagogic strategies which, when using concrete and daily situations, were able to cope with the social handicaps of this part of the population.
References
Secretaria do Desenvolvimento Trabalho e Solidariedade - SDTS - Pobreza e violência no município de São Paulo. São Paulo. 2002.
Pochmann, M. (org.) Outra cidade é possível: alternativas de inclusão social em São Paulo: Cortez.2003.
Pochmann M. (org) Desenvolvimento, trabalho e solidariedade: novos caminhos para a inclusão social. Ed. Cortcz. 2002.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Disponivel em: http://www.ibge.gov.br. [2Q04 Set 17].
Fundação Sistema Estadual de Anàlise de Dados SEADE. Disponível em: http://www. seade. gov.br/produtos/prod-outrossitios htm: [2004 Ag 28].
Lefevre F, Lefevre AMC. O Discurso do Sujeito Coletivo. Um novo enfoque em pesquisa qualitativa (Desdobramentos) . Caxias do Sul, Educs. 2003.
Chiavenato I. Talento e empregabilidade. Disponível em: http://www.chiavenato.com. [2004 Set17].
Projelo de Lei 3.534104 do Deputado Orlando Fantazzini. Regula a profissão de pesquisador e técnico de mercado, opinião e mídia e organiza os conselhos regionais e federal das categorias. Disponível em: http://www.sbpm.org.br/main-.gov br [2Q04Set 17].
Dolle J M. Para compreender Jean Piaget. Riode Janeiro, Zahar 1978.
Boden M. As idéias de Piaget. São Paulo, Cultrix, 1983.
Piaget J. Seis estudos de psicologia. Rio de Janeiro, Forense, 1972.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis