Evidencia de Validez de la Escala Jerárquica de Job Crafting, en el contexto brasileño

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3313

Palabras clave:

trabajadores, evaluación psicológica, psicometría, análisis factorial

Resumen

Job crafting se caracteriza por el comportamiento proactivo del trabajador que pretende dar sentido y trascendencia a su relación laboral, posibilitándole al individuo asumir un rol protagónico actuando como un agente del cambio. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo recopilar evidencias de validez de la Escala Jerárquica de Job Crafting, en el contexto brasileño. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 675 trabajadores brasileños, de ambos sexos, con edades entre 18 y 82 años. El Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio señaló que el modelo de 18 ítems, divididos en cuatro factores reflexivos (aumento de recursos, aumento de demandas desafiantes, reducción de demandas y optimización de demandas) y un factor formativo (job crafting), fue el que presentó mejores índices de ajuste. Los resultados mostraron una correlación positiva con el compromiso en el trabajo y negativa con el agotamiento en el trabajo. Se concluyó que el instrumento presentó propiedades psicométricas que recomiendan su uso en futuras investigaciones sobre job crafting.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

  • Filipi Junger Branco Brasil, Universidade Salgado de Oliveira

    Universidade Salgado de Oliveira, Niterói-RJ, Brazil

  • Larissa Maria David Gabardo-Martins, Universidade Salgado de Oliveira

    Universidade Salgado de Oliveira, Niterói-RJ, Brazil

Referencias

Bakker, A. B. (2015). Top-down and bottom-up interventions to increase work engagement. In P. J. Hartung, M. L. Savickas, & B. W. Walsh (Eds.), APA handbook of career intervention: Vol. 2. Applications (pp. 427-438). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14439-031

Carlotto, M. S., & Câmara, S. G. (2007). Preditores da síndrome de Burnout em professores [Predictors of Burnout Syndrome in teachers]. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 11(1), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-85572007000100010

Chinelato, R. S. C., Ferreira, M. C., & Valentini, F. (2015). Evidence of validity of the Job Crafting Behaviors Scale. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 25(62), 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272562201506

Concolatto, C. P., Rodrigues, T. G., & Oltramari, A. P. (2017). Mudanças nas relações de trabalho e o papel simbólico do trabalho na atualidade [Changes in work relations and the symbolic role of work today]. Farol: Revista de Estudos Organizacionais e Sociedade, 4(09), 340-389. https://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/farol/article/view/3254

Costantini, A., Demerouti, E., Ceschi, A., & Sartori, R. (2019). Evidence on the hierarchical, multidimensional nature of behavioural job crafting. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 311-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12232

Devotto, R. P., & Machado, W. L. (2017). Job crafting: Uma revisão da produção científica internacional [Job Crafting: A review of international scientific production]. Psico-USF, 22(3), 413-423. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712017220303

Devotto, R. P., & Machado, W. L. (2020). Evidências de validade da versão brasileira do Job Crafting Questionnaire [Validity evidences of the Brazilian version of the Job Crafting Questionnaire]. Psico-USF, 25(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712020250104

Ferreira, M. C., Valentini, F., Damásio, B. F., Mourão, L., Porto, J. B., Chinelato, R. S. C., Novaes, V. P., & Pereira, M. M. (2016). Evidências adicionais de validade da UWES-9 em amostras brasileiras [Additional validity evidences of UWES-9 in Brazilian samples]. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 21(4), 435-445. https://doi.org/10.5935/1678-4669.20160042

Fischer, R., & Karl, J. A. (2019). A primer to (Cross-Cultural) multi-group invariance testing possibilities in R. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1507. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01507

Gennaro, D. (2019). Job crafting: The art of redesigning a job. Emerald.

Grégoire, J. (2018). ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests. International Journal of Testing, 18(2), 101-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2017.1398166

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Evaluation of Formative Measurement Models. In Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using R. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_5

Hakanen, J. J., Peeters, M. C. W., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). Different types of employee well-being across time and their relationships with job crafting. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(2), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000081

Hauck-Filho, N., & Valentini, F. (2020). Coeficientes de fidedignidade e violações dos pressupostos essencialmente tau-equivalentes [Reliability coefficients and violations of essentially tau-equivalent assumptions]. Avaliação Psicológica, 19(3), a-b. https://dx.doi.org/10.15689/ap.2020.1903.ed

Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2020). Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations. Australian Journal of Management, 45(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219871976

Moura, J. S., Ribeiro, J. C. O. A., Castro Neta, A. A., & Nunes, C. P. (2019). A precarização do trabalho docente e o adoecimento mental no contexto neoliberal [The precariousness of teaching work and mental illness in the neoliberal context]. Revista Profissão Docente, 19(40), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.31496/rpd.v19i40.1242

Petrou, P., Demerouti, E., Peeters, M. C. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hetland, J. (2012). Crafting a job on a daily basis: Contextual correlates and the link to work engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(8), 1120-1141. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1783

Rudolph, C. W., Katz, I. M., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2017). Job crafting: A meta‐ analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 112-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.05.008

Schaufeli, W. (2021). Engaging leadership: How to promote work engagement? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 754556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754556

Schwartz, Y., Duc, M., & Durrive, L. (2021). Trabalho e uso de si. In Y. Schwartz & L. Durrive (Orgs.), Work and ergology: conversations about human activity (3a ed., pp. 191-206). EdUFF.

Slemp, G. R., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2013). The Job Crafting Questionnaire: A new scale to measure the extent to which employees engage in job crafting. International Journal of Wellbeing, 3(2), 126-146. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v3i2.1

Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.009

Xia, Y., & Yang, Y. (2019). RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 409-428. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2

Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4378011

Zhang, F., & Parker, S. K. (2019). Reorienting job crafting research: A hierarchical structure of job crafting concepts and integrative review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(2), 126-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2332

Publicado

2024-05-04

Número

Sección

Evaluación Psicológica

Cómo citar

Brasil, F. J. B., & Gabardo-Martins, L. M. D. (2024). Evidencia de Validez de la Escala Jerárquica de Job Crafting, en el contexto brasileño. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 33, e3313. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3313