On The Influences In The Training of The Physical Geographer From The Contributions of An Anglo-Saxon Geographical Matrix
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/rdg.v36i0.148340Keywords:
Historical Science, Geographical Theory, Physical Geography, Historical GeographyAbstract
Brazilian physical geography, especially after the diffusion of a mathematical and statistical approach, whether upon a systems theoretical standpoint or the direct search for causal relationships, assisted by the growing support of digital modeling, has come close, deliberately or not, to the Anglo-Saxon, highly empirical, geographical tradition. A landmark of this affiliation was the emergence of a long-standing diatribe between the appreciation of time over other elements involved in the spatial explanation. Its overcoming, in favor of surficial processes of different operational magnitudes, following the second half of the 20th Century, was linked to important changes in social history and their reverberations on Science and its final aims. Contemporarily, a revival of time as a significant variable is accompanied by its adjustment to the thematic necessities of the geographical studies, therefore not a taken for granted a priori category. Physical geography of Anglo-Saxon derivation is highly dependent on technique, and lately reflects, as do other historical sciences with experimental interfaces, a dependence on the scientific method and the rise of problem situations.
Downloads
References
AGASSIZ, L.; AGASSIZ, E. 1868. A Journey in Brazil. Boston: Ticknor & Fields.
AKKERMAN, A. 2001. Urban planning in the founding of Cartesian thought. Philosophy & Geography, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp. 141 – 167.
AL MONAES, W. A. 1991. Muslim contributions to geography until the end of the 12th century AD. GeoJournal. Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 393–400
BAKER, V. R. 2008. The Spokane Flood debates: historical background and philosophical perspective, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 301, 33-50
BENGTSON, S. 1994. Early Life on Earth. Columbia University Press, 630 p.
BERTRAND, G. 1972. Paisagem e geografia física global: um esboço metodológico. Revista IGEOG/USP, São Paulo: USP, n. 13. Caderno de ciências da terra.
BRIAN, K. 1944. Physical Geography in the Training of the Geographer. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 183-189
BUTTIMER, A. 2001. Beyond Humboldtian Science and Goethe’s Way of Science: Challenges of Alexander von Humboldt’s Geography. Erdkunde 55(2): 105–120
CARREGA, P. 2013. Geographical Information and Climatology. Wiley, 288 p
CHORLEY, R.J. 1965. A re-evaluation of the geomorphic system of W.M. Davis. In: CHORLEY, R.J. e HAGGET, P. (eds) Frontiers in geographical teaching. London: Methuem, p. 21-38
CHORLEY, R. J., & KENNEDY, B. A. 1971. Physical Geography: A systems approach. London: Prentice-Hall International. 370 p.
CLARKE, K. 2018. Shaping the Geography of Empire: Man and Nature in Herodotus' Histories. Oxford Press, 368 p.
CLEMENTS, F. E. 1916. Plant Sucession. Carnegie Institution, Publication 242, Washington D.C.
CLIFFORD, N. 2001. Editorial: Physical Geography – the naughty world revisited. Transc. Inst. Brit. Geogr.
CONTI, J. B. 2005. Considerações sobre as mudanças climáticas globais. Revista do Departamento de Geografia, 16. Pg 70-75.
DARWIN, C. 1839. The Voyage of the Beagle. London.
DAVIS, W. M. 1899. The Geographical Cycle. In: Geographical Journal of The Royal Geographical Society. V. 14. N 5. Pg. 481-504.
DIAMOND, J. 2005. Collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Penguin, 626p
DIXON, C. 2003. Historical Etnobiogeography of the Spread of Lethal Yellowing in the Western Caribbean. Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, New Orelans, LA.
DRIVER, F; MARTINS, L. 2005. Tropical Visions in an Age of Empire. University of Chicago Press, 279 p.
DUNBAR, G. S. 2001. Geography: Discipline, Profession and Subject since 1870. Springer Verlag, 336 p.
FEHIGE, Y. 2016. Science and Religion: East and West. Routledge India. 232 p.
GUARÍN A. 2004. Alexander von Humboldt and the Origins of Our Modern Geographical View of Earth. In: JANELLE D.G., WARF B., HANSEN K. (eds) WorldMinds: Geographical Perspectives on 100 Problems. Springer, Dordrecht
KUHN, T. S. H. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition. University of Chicago Press. 264 p.
MACDONALD, F; WITHERS, C. W. J. 2015. Geography, Technology and Instruments of Exploration. Routledge. 282 p
MALTHUS, T. 1798. An essay on the Principle of Population. London.
MASOUDA, A & KOIKE, K. 2011. Morphotectonics inferred from the analysis of topographic lineaments auto-detected from DEMs: Application and validation for the Sinai Peninsula, Egypt. Tectonophysics. Volume 510, Issues 3–4, 291-308.
MASSEY, D. 2012. For Space. London: Sage, 222p
MENDONCA, F. A. 1998. Geografia Fisica: Ciencia Humana?. Sao Paulo: Contexto, 90p
O’DWYER, J.P.; GREEN. J. L. 2009. Field theory for biogeography: a spatially explicit model for predicting patterns of biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 13, 84-95
SAUER, C. O. 1956. The Education of a Geographer. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. V. 46. N.3.
SLAYMAKER, O.; SPENCER, T.; EMBLETON-HAMANN, C. 2012. Geomorphology and Global Environmental Change. Change. Wiley. 450 p.
STODDART, D. R. 1966. Darwin's Impact on Geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. Vol. 56, pp. 683-698.
SUERTEGARAY, D. M. A. 2002. Geografia Física e Geomorfologia: uma (re) leitura. 1. ed. Ijuí: Editora Unijuí, 112p
SWAFFIELD, S. R. & O'CONNOR, K. F. 1986. Conceiving, Perceiving, Protecting and Using New Zealand Landscape Systems. Canterbury: Centre for Resource Management, Lincoln College.
VARENIUS, B. 1650. Geografia Geral-en la que se explican las propriedades generales de la tierra. 2.ed. Trad. José Maria Requejo Prieto. Barcelona: Ediciones de la Universidad de Barcelona, (1984).
VORZIMMER, P. 1969. Darwin, Malthus, and the Theory of Natural Selection. Journal of the History of Ideas. Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 527-542
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution BY-NC-SA que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista. A licença adotada enquadra-se no padrão CC-BY-NC-SA.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).