Desigualdade e Legitimidade: problematizando a produção de conhecimento social
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2021.191135Palavras-chave:
Pesquisa social e desigualdade, Trabalho de campo, Autoria, Regulação de discursosResumo
Nos últimos quarenta anos, as ciências sociais e sobretudo a antropologia passaram por mudanças significativas. Neste artigo, reflito sobre questões e dilemas que dizem respeito à maneira pela qual se produzem pesquisas sociais, sobretudo ao trabalho de campo em situações marcadas por grandes desigualdades. Dizem também respeito à questão de como conceber as representações dos achados dessas pesquisas e a autoria. E, finalmente, concernem às possibilidades de circulação dos discursos.
Downloads
Referências
Abílio, Ludmila Costhek. (2020), “Uberização e juventude periférica”. Novos Estudos, 39 (3): 579-597.
Adorno, Sérgio. (2012), “O autor nos escritos de Foucault: entre o discurso e a morte”. Jornal de Psicanálise, 45 (82): 113-128.
Agee, James & Evans, Walker. ([1941] 1969), Let us now praise famous men. Boston, Houghton Mifflin Co.
Balbachevsky, Elizabeth; Sampaio, Helena & Andrade, Cibele Yahn de. (2019), “Expanding access to higher education and its (limited) consequences for social inclusion: The Brazilian experience”. Social Inclusion 7 (1): 7-17.
Benson, Koni & Nagar, Richa. (2006), “Collaboration as resistance? Reconsidering the processes, products, and possibilities of feminist oral history and ethnography”. Gender, Place and Culture, 13 (5): 581-592.
Caldeira, Teresa Pires do Rio. (1981), “Uma incursão pelo lado ‘não respeitável’ da pesquisa de campo”. In: Ciências Sociais Hoje, 1 (Trabalho e Cultura no Brasil). Recife/Brasília, anpocs/cnpq, pp. 332-54.
Caldeira, Teresa Pires do Rio. (1988), “A presença do autor e a pós-modernidade em antropologia”. Novos Estudos Cebrap, 21: 133-157.
Caldeira, Teresa P. R. (2011), “Apresentação: Ruth Corrêa Leite Cardoso: a intelectual e seu tempo”. In: Ruth Cardoso – Obra Reunida. São Paulo, Mameluco, pp. 8-38.
Caldeira, Teresa P. R. (2012), “Imprinting and moving around: New visibilities and configurations of public space in São Paulo”. Public Culture 24 (2): 385-419.
Caldeira, Teresa P. R. (2021). “Fieldwork: problems we are still required to think”. Hau: Journal on Ethnographic Theory, 11 (2): 720-725.
Cardoso, Ruth C. L. ([1979] 2011), “Notas para discussão”. In: Ruth Cardoso – Obra Reunida, org. de Teresa P. R. Caldeira. São Paulo, Mameluco, pp. 197-202.
Cardoso, Ruth C. L. (1986), (org.). A aventura antropológica: teoria e pesquisa. Rio de Janeiro, Paz e Terra.
Clifford, James. (1983), “On ethnographic authority”. Representations, 2: 132-143.
Clifford, James & Marcus, George. (eds.). (1986), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Dattatreyan, Ethiraj Gabriel e Isaac Marrero-Guillamón. (2019), “Introduction: Multimodal anthropology and the politics of invention”. American Anthropologist, 121 (1): 220-228.
Denby, David. (2006), “A famous man. The collected works of James Agee”. The New Yorker, January 9th, https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2006/01/09/a-famous-man.
Durham, Eunice Ribeiro. (1986), “A pesquisa antropológica com populações urbanas: problemas e perspectivas”. In: Cardoso, Ruth C. L. (org.). A aventura antropológica: teoria e pesquisa. Rio de Janeiro, Paz e Terra.
Foucault, Michel. (1979), Microfísica do poder. Rio de Janeiro, Graal.
Foucault, Michel. (1980), Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Colin Gordon, editor. Nova York, Pantheon Books.
Foucault, Michel. ([1970] 1984), “What is an author?”. In: Rabinow, Paul, editor. Foucault reader. Nova York, Pantheon Books, pp. 101-121.
Geertz, Clifford. (1973), The interpretation of cultures. Nova York, Basic Books.
Marcus, George. (1995), “Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography”. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24: 95-117.
Marcus, George. (2008), “The end(s) of ethnography: social/cultural anthropology’s signature form of producing knowledge in transition”. Cultural Anthropology. 23 (1): 1-14.
Marcus, George. (2018), “Foreword. Collaboration mode 3: a found condition of anthropological field research today… and what might be made of it”. In: Estalella, A. & Sánchez Criado, T. (eds.). Experimental collaborations. Nova York, Berghahn Books, pp xi-xvi.
Nader, Laura. (1969), “Up the anthropologist: perspectives gained for studying up”. In: Hymes, Dell, editor. Reinventing anthropology. Nova York, Pantheon, pp. 284-311.
Nagar, Richa. (2003), “Collaboration across borders: moving beyond positionality”. In consultation with Farah Ali and Sangatin women’s collective. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 24 (3): 356-372.
Poovey, Mary. (1998), A history of the modern fact: problems of knowledge in the sciences of wealth and society. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Rabinow, Paul. (1977), Reflections on fieldwork in Morocco. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Rabinow, Paul. (2002), “Midst anthropology’s problems”. Cultural Anthropology, 17 (2): 135-49.
Rabinow, Paul. (2007), Reflections on fieldwork in Morocco. 30th anniversary edition. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Sánchez Criado, Tomás & Estalella, Adolfo. (2018), “Introduction. Experimental collaborations”. In: Estalella, Adolfo & Sánchez Criado, Tomás, editors. Experimental Collaborations. Nova York, Berghahn Books, pp. 1-30.
Stocking Jr., George, W. (1983), “The ethnographer’s magic: fieldwork in British anthropology from Tylor to Malinowski”. In: Stocking Jr., George W., ed., Observers observed: Essays on ethnographic fieldwork. Madison, University of Wisconsin Press.
Sunder Rajan, Kaushik. (2006), Biocapital: The constitution of postgenomic life. Durham, nc: Duke University Press.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Teresa Pires do Rio Caldeira
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
