The concept of social location in the sociology of knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20702014000200003Abstract
Sociologists of knowledge have attempted to explain the beliefs of epistemic agents in terms of their social location within a hierarchy of power relationships. This paper proposes an alternative way of conceiving the social location of epistemic agents. Drawing on the Durkheimian notions of social integration and social density, it will define an agent's social location in terms of the density of their relations within social networks. For the sociology of scientific knowledge in particular, it will focus on social relations within professional networks of scientists. Then the paper will address the applicability of the network concept of social location to the sociology of knowledge generally.Downloads
References
Ben-David, Joseph & Aran, Lydia. (1991), “Socialization and Career patterns as determinants of productivity of medical researchers”. In: Freudenthal, Gad (org.). Scientific growth: essays on the social organization and ethos of science. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Crane, Diana. (1972), Invisible colleges: diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Durkheim, Émile. (1895), Les règles de la méthode sociologique. Paris, Alcan.
______. (1897), Le suicide: étude de sociologie. Paris, Alcan.
______. ([1893] 1902), De la division du travail social: étude sur l’organisation des sociétés supérieures. Paris, Alcan.
Gaines, Laura J. (1998), “The roots of a woman”. In: Pattatucci, Angela M. (org.). Women in science. Thousand Oaks, ca, Sage.
Hacking, Ian. (1999), The social construction of what? Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Harding, Sandra. (1986), The science question in feminism. Ithaca, ny, Cornell University Press.
______. (2007), “Feminist standpoints”. In: Hesse-Biber, Sharlene Nagy (org.).
Handbook of feminist research. Thousand Oaks, ca, Sage.
Hartsock, Nancy. (1997), “Standpoint theories for the next century”. In: Kenney, Sally J. & Kinsella, Helen (orgs.). Politics and feminist standpoint theories. Nova York, Haworth Press.
Heckman, Susan. (1997), “Truth and method: feminist standpoint theory revisited”. Signs, 22 (2): 341-365.
Hesse-Biber, Sharlene Nagy (org.). (2007), Handbook of feminist research. Thousand Oaks, ca, Sage.
Jenkins, Philip. (1994), Using murder: the social construction of serial homicide. Nova Brunswick, nj, Transaction Publishers.
Lennon, Kathleen. (2003), “Naturalising and interpretive turns in epistemology”. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 11: 245-259.
______. (2004), “Feminist epistemology”. In: Niiniluoto, Ilkka; Sintonen, Matti & Wolenski, Jan (orgs.). Handbook of epistemology. Dordrecht, Kluwer.
Longino, Helen. (2002), The fate of knowledge. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Mackenzie, Donald. (1981), Statistics in Britain, 1865-1930: the social construction of scientific knowledge. Edimburgo, Edinburgh University Press.
______. (1990), Inventing accuracy: an historical sociology of nuclear missile guidance. Cambridge, mit Press.
Mannheim, Karl. (1936), Ideology and utopia. Londres, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
______. (1952), “The problem of a sociology of knowledge”. In: ______. Essays on the sociology of knowledge. Nova York, Oxford University Press.
Marx, Karl. (1859), “Preface to A contribution to the critique of political economy”. Disponível em www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1859/critique-pol-economy/preface.htm, consultado em 23/7/2014 (em alemão, disponível em www.mlwerke.de/me/me13/me13_007.htm, consultado em 23/7/2014).
Pattatucci, Angela M. (org.). (1998), Women in science. Thousand Oaks, ca, Sage.
Pinnick, Cassandra. (1994), “Feminist epistemology: implication for philosophy of science”. Philosophy of Science, 61: 646-657.
Rollin, Kristina. (2002), “Gender and trust in science”. Hypatia, 17: 95-118.
Scott, Joan W. (1991), “The evidence of experience”. Critical Inquiry, 17: 773-797.
Solomon, Miriam & Alan Richardson. (2005), “A critical context for longino’s critical contextual empiricism”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 36: 211-22.
Sonnert, Gerhard & Holton, Gerald. (1995), Gender differences in science careers: the project access study. New Brunswick, nj, Rutgers University Press.
Watson, James D. (1969), The double helix. Nova York, Atheneum.
Wray, K. Brad. (2002), “The epistemic significance of collaborative research”. Philosophy of Science, 69: 150-68.
______. (2007), “Evaluating scientists: examining the effects of sexism and nepotism”. In: Kincaid, Harold; Dupré, John & Wylie, Alison (orgs.). Value-free science? Ideals and illusions. Nova York, Oxford University Press.
Wylie, Alison. (2003), “Why standpoint matters”. In: Figueroa, Robert & Harding, Sandra (orgs.). Science and other cultures: issues in philosophies of science and technology. Nova York, Routledge.
______. (2007), “The feminism question in science: what does it mean to ‘do social science as a feminist?’” In: Hesse-Biber, Sharlene Nagy (org.). Handbook of feminist research. Thousand Oaks, ca, Sage.
Zollman, Kevin J. S. (2007), “The communication structure of epistemic communities”. Philosophy of Science, 74: 574-87.
Zuckerman, Harriett (1977), Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. Nova York, Free Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Tempo Social
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
