Lulism and the Institutionalization of Social Movements in Brazil: Strengthening Democratic Inclusion and Perpetuating Hegemony
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2017.118722Palabras clave:
Institutionalization of social movements, Social movements, Lulism, Hegemony, Democratic governanceResumen
This paper assesses the democratizing potential of the institutionalization of social movements in Brazil under the Lula Government, in order to evaluate their impact on political hegemony and social inclusion when they establish close links with the state apparatus. We focus on rural movements and the Sustainable Development Program of Rural Territories (Pronat), and show that the institutionalization of a significant part of the rural movement was part of the
phenomenon known as Lulism, a social class alliance in which social movements had a prominent role that enabled the Lula government to consolidate its hold on power. We argue that social movements have not only successfully converted their demands into public policies and strengthened political participation, but also perpetuated class hegemony and legitimated the authority of the government
Descargas
Referencias
Abers, R. N. & Von Bülow, M. (2011), “Movimentos sociais na teoria e na prática: como estudar o ativismo através da fronteira entre Estado e sociedade?”. Sociologias, 13 (28): 52-84.
______; Serafim, L. & Tatagiba, L. (2014), “Repertórios de interação estado-sociedade em um estado heterogêneo: a experiência na Era Lula”. Dados [on-line]. 57 (2): 325-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0011-5258201411.
Abramovay, R. (1998), “Agriculture familiale et développement territorial au Brésil”. Ruralia: Revue de l’Association des Ruralistes Français, 1 (3): 91-112.
______. (2000), “O capital social dos territórios: repensando o desenvolvimento rural”. Economia Aplicada, 4 (2): 379-397.
______. (2001a), “Agricultura familiar y desarrollo territorial”. Reforma Agraria: Colonización, Cooperativas – fao, 1: 28-43.
______. (2001b), “Conselhos além dos limites”. Estudos Avançados, 15 (43): 121-140. Disponível em http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-40142001000300011&lng=en&nrm=iso, consultado em 7/5/2017.
______. (2005), “Representatividade e inovação”. Seminário Nacional de Desenvolvimento Rural Sustentável. Brasília, iica-sdt/mda.
______; Magalhaes, R. & Schroder, M. (2010), “Representatividade e inovação na governança dos processos participativos: o caso das organizações brasileiras de agricultores familiares”. Sociologias [on-line]. 12 (24): 268-306. issn 1517-4522.
Amenta, E. (2006), When movements matter: The Townsend Plan and the rise of social security. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Anderson, Perry (1976), “The antinomies of Antonio Gramsci”. New Left Review, 100: 5-78.
Avritzer, L. (2002a), Democracy and the public space in Latin America. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
______. (2002b), “Orçamento participativo: as experiências de Porto Alegre e Belo Horizonte”. In: Dagnino, E. (ed.). Sociedade civil e espaços públicos no Brasil. São Paulo, Paz e Terra.
______. (2008), “Instituições participativas e desenho institucional: algumas considerações sobre a variação da participação no Brasil democrático”. Opinião Publica [on-line], 14 (1): 43-64.
______. (2010), “Living under a democracy: participation and its impacts on the living conditions of the poor”. Latin American Research Review, 45: 166-85.
______. (2012), “The different designs of public participation in Brazil: deliberation, power sharing and public ratification”. Critical Policy Studies, 6 (2): 113-127.
Baiocchi, G. (2005), Militants and citizens: the politics of participation in Porto Alegre. Stanford, Stanford University Press.
Barbosa, R.; Zimmermann, S. & Tecchio, A. (2013), “Território da Serra Geral (mg)”. In: Leite, S. P. (org.). Políticas de desenvolvimento territorial e enfrentamento da pobreza rural no Brasil. Brasília, iica, vol. 2.
Bebbington, A.; Abramovay, R. & Chiriboga, M. (2008), “Social movements and the dynamics of rural territorial development in Latin America”. World Development, 36 (12): 2874-2887. Disponível em http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X0800243X, acessado em 7/5/2017.
Bonnal, P. & Piraux, M. (2007), Dinâmicas territoriais, projetos coletivos e multifuncionalidade da agricultura familiar na região do Entorno de Campina Grande (Paraíba). Rio de Janeiro (Report 3.4).
Brasil. (2005), Institucionalidades para a gestão social do desenvolvimento rural sustentável. Brasília, mda/Condraf (série Documento do Condraf, 1).
Brett, E. A. (2003), “Participation and accountability in development management”. Journal of Development Studies, 40 (2).
______. (2012), Problematizing the democratic imperative: the challenge of transition and consolidation in weak states. http://www.psa.ac.uk/sites/default/files/942_470.pdf.
Carroll, W. K. Ratner, R. S. ( July 1994), “Between leninism and radical pluralism: Gramscian reflections on counter-hegemony and the new social movements”.Critical Sociology, 20: 3-26.
Clemens, E. (2010), “Repertórios organizacionais e mudança institucional: grupos de mulheres e a transformação na política dos Estados Unidos”. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, 3 (161).
Coy, P. G. & Hedeen, T. (2005), “A stage model of social movement co‐optation: Community mediation in the United States”. The Sociological Quarterly, 46: 405-435.
cpt – Comissão Pastoral da Terra. (2011), Conflitos no campo. Goiânia, cpt, 2010, vol. 26. Disponível em http://www.cptpe.org.br/index.php/downloads/finish/4-caderno-conflitos/190-conflitos-no-campo-brasil-2010.html.
D’Araújo, Maria Celina. (2009), A elite dirigente do governo Lula. Rio de Janeiro, cpdoc/fgv.
Della Porta, D. & Diani, M. (2009), Social movements: an introduction. Nova York, John Wiley & Sons.
Diani, M. (1992), The concept of social movement. The Sociological Review, 40: 1-25.
Druck, G. (2006), “Os sindicatos, os movimentos sociais e o governo Lula: cooptação e resistência”. Osal – Observatorio Social de America Latina, vi (9).
Eder, K. (1996), “The institutionalization of environmentalism: ecological discourse and the second transformation of the public sphere”. In: Lash, S; Szerszynski, B. & Wynne, B. (eds.), Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology. London, Sage, pp. 203-23.
Escobar, A. Alavarez, S. (ed.) (1992), The making of social movements in Latin America: identity, strategy and democracy. Boulder/San Francisco, Westview Press/Oxford.
European Commission. (1999), Ex-post evaluation of the Leader i community initiative 1989-1993: executive sumary. Brussels, European Commission.
______. (2003), Ex-post evaluation of the community initiative Leader ii: final report volume 1: main report. Vienna: ec – dg Agriculture – Öir – Managementdienste GmbH.
Favareto, A. (2010), “A abordagem territorial do desenvolvimento rural: mudança institucional ou ‘inovação por adição’?”. Estudos Avançados, 24 (68): 299-319. Disponível em http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-40142010000100021&lng=en&nrm=iso, consultado em 7/5/2017.
______ & Schroder, M. (2007), “Do território como ‘ator’ ao território como ‘campo’: uma análise da introdução da abordagem territorial nas políticas de desenvolvimento rural no Brasil”. Congresso Brasileiro de Economia e Sociologia Rural, Londrina.
Finer, S. (1958), Anonymous empire: a study of the lobby in Great Britain. London, Pall Mall.
Forgacs, D. (1988), An Antonio Gramsci reader: selected writings, 1916-1935. New York, Schocken Books.
Forsyth, T. (1999), International investment and climate change: energy technologies for developing countries. London, Earthscan.
______. (2002), “Environmental social movements in Thailand: a critical assessment”. Asian Review. Bangkok, Institute of Asian Studies, Chulalongkorn University, pp. 104-124.
______. (2007), “Are environmental social movements socially exclusive? An historical study from Thailand”. World Development, 35 (12): 2110-2130.
Foweraker, Joe (1995), Theorizing social movements. London/Boulder, Pluto Press.
______. (2001), Grassroots movements, political activism and social development in Latin America: a comparison of Chile and Brazil. Geneva, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. Available from http://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005bccf9/(httpAuxPages)/dc22E12D3F6ab4eb80256B5E004D27A8/$file/fowerake.pdf.
Freitas, A. F.; Freitas, Alair Ferreira & Dias, M. M. (2010), “Desafios da gestão social dos territórios rurais”. Anais do 48º Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administração e Sociologia Rural. Brasília-df, Sober, vol. 1, pp. 126-127, http://www.sober.org.br/palestra/15/1078.pdf.
Fung, A. A. & Wright, E. O. (2003), Deepening democracy: institutional innovation in empowered participatory governance. London, Verso.
Gamson, W. A. (1975), The strategy of social protest. Homewood, Ill., The Dorsey Press.
Gaventa, J. (2004), “Towards participatory governance: assessing the transformative possibilities”. In: Hickey, S. & Mohan, G. (eds.). From tyranny to transformation. London, Zed Books.
Gehlen, I. & Riella, A. (2004), “Dinâmicas territoriais e desenvolvimento sustentável”. Sociologias [on-line], 11: 20-26. www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-45222004000100003&lng=en&nrm=iso, consultado em 7/5/2017.
Giugni, M. G. & Florence, P. (1998), “Contentious politics in complex societies: new social movements between conflict and cooperation”. In: Giugni, M. G.; McAdam, D. & Tilly, C. (eds.). From contention to democracy. Lanham, md, Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 81-107.
Gohn, M. da G. M. (2000), Teoria dos movimentos sociais: paradigmas clássicos e contemporâneos. 2 ed. São Paulo, Edições Loyola.
______. (2008), Novas teorias dos movimentos sociais. São Paulo, Loyola.
Goldstone, J. A. (2004), “More social movements or fewer? Beyond political opportunity structures to relational fields”. Theory and Society, 33: 333-365.
Gómez Bruera, Hernán. (2015), “Participation under Lula: between electoral politics and governability”. Latin American Politics and Society, 57 (2): 1-20.
Gramsci, A. (1971), Selections from the prison notebooks. New York, International Publishers. Habermas, J. (1981), “New social movements”. Telos, 49: 33-37.
______. (1984), Mudança estrutural da esfera pública. Rio de Janeiro, Tempo Brasileiro. Hershberg, E. & Rosen, F. (2006), Latin America after neoliberalism: turning the tide in the 21st century? New York, New Press.
Hipsher, P. L. (1998), “Democratic transitions as protest cycles: social movement dynamics in democratizing Latin America”. In: Meyer, David S. & Tarrow, Sidney (eds.). Social movement society: contentious politics for a new century. Lanham, md, Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 153-72.
Hochstetler, K. (2008), “Organized civil society in Lula’s Brazil”. Democratic Brazil Revisited, 33-53. Jaffee, D. (2012), “Weak coffee: certification and co-optation in the fair trade movement”. Social Problems, 59: 94-116.
Jobert, Annette (2006), “Le dialogue social territorial: cadres nationaux et diversités territoriales”. Les Cinquièmes Journées de la Proximité. “La proximité, entre interactions et institutions”. Gres, Bordeaux, 28-30 Juin. http://beagle.ubordeaux4.fr/conf2006/viewpaper.php?id=74&print=1#_ftnref1.
Katzenstein, M. F. (1998), “Stepsisters: feminist movement activism in different institutional spaces”. In: Meyer, David S. & Tarrow, Sidney (eds.). Social movement society: contentious politics for a new century. Lanham, md, Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 195-216.
Keck, M. E. (1992), The worker’s party and democratization in Brazil. New Haven/London, Yale University Press.
Lasa, C. & Delgado, N. (2013), “O território Irecê (ba)”. In: Leite, S. P. (org.). Políticas de desenvolvimento territorial e enfrentamento da pobreza rural no Brasil. Brasília, iica, vol. 2.
Leite, S. (2010), Governance of public policies for rural development in Brazil. New Delhi, http://www.rimisp.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Paper_English_Segio_Pereira_Leite.pdf.
Leite, S. P. et al. (2013), “Análise de políticas públicas de enfrentamento da pobreza rural na perspectiva do desenvolvimento territorial: estudos de caso em diferentes territórios no Brasil”. xxix Congresso da Associação Latino-Americana de Sociologia (Alas), 2013, Santiago, Chile, Crisis y Emergenciais Sociales en América Latina.
Maheu, Louis (ed.). (1995), Social movements and social classes: the future of collective action. London, Sage.
Marglin, F. A. & Marglin, S. A. (eds.). (1990), Dominating knowledge: development culture and resistance. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Melucci, A. (1980), “The new social movements: a theoretical approach”. Social Science Information, 19 (2): 199-226.
Meyer, David S. (2007), The politics of protest: social movements in America. New York, Oxford University Press.
Moroni, José Antonio. (2006), “O direito à participação no governo Lula”. 32th International Conference on Social Welfare. http://www.icsw.org/images/docs/Events/2006_Brazil/19_07_pdf/jose_antonio_moroni.pdf.
Murphree, D. W.; Wright, S. A. & Ebaugh, H. R. (1996), “Toxic waste siting and community resistance: how cooptation of local citizen opposition failed”. Sociological Perspectives, 39: 447-463.
Oliveira, F. de (2007), “Hegemonia às avessas”. Piauí, 7, http://revistapiaui.estadao.com.br/edicao-4/tribuna livre/hegemonia-as-avessas.
Oommen, T. K. (1990), “Movements and institutions: structural opposition or processual linkage?”. International Sociology, 5: 145-156.
Pellow, D. N. (1999), “Framing emerging environmental movement tactics: mobilizing consensus, demobilizing conflict”. Paper presented at the Sociological Forum.
Pogrebinschi, Thamy (2013), The squared circle of participatory democracy: scaling up deliberation to the national level. Critical Policy Studies 7 (3): 219-41.
______ & Samuels, David (2014), “The impact of participatory democracy: evidence from Brazil’s national public policy conferences”. Comparative Politics 46, (3): 313-32.
Presidência da República (pr). Secretaria de Comunicação Social (2010), Caderno destaques: ações e programas do governo federal. Brasília, Secretaria de Comunicação Social.
Pritchett, L. & Woolcock, M. (2002), “Solutions when the solution is the problem: arraying the disarray in development”. Center for Global Development. Washington D.C, Working Paper, n. 10.
Ray, C. (2000), “The eu Leader Programme: rural development laboratory?”. Sociologia Ruralis, 40 (2): 163-171.
Rita, Giuseppe & Bonomi, Aldo. (1998), Manifesto per lo Sviluppo Locale: Dall’azione di comunità ai Patti territoriali. Torino, Bollati Boringhieri.
Ruzza, Carlo. (1997), “Institutional Actors and the Italian Peace Movement: Specializing and Branching Out”. Theory and Society, 26: 87-127.
Santoro, W. A. & Brown, T. N. (2003), “Accommodationist tendencies and micro-level institutionalization: evidence from the civil rights movement”. American Sociological Association, 1.
______ & McGuire, G. M. (1997), “Social movement insiders: the impact of institutional activists on affirmative action and comparable worth policies”. Social Problems, 44: 503-519.
Santos, B. de S. (1998), “Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: toward a redistributive democracy”. Politics and Society, 26 (4): 461-510.
______ & Avritzer, L. (2002), “Para ampliar o cânone democrático”. In: Santos, Boaventura de S. (org.). Democratizar a democracia: os caminhos da democracia participativa. Rio de Janeiro, Civilização Brasileira.
Schiavinato, M. (2010), “As instituições do desenvolvimento territorial rural: governança, arenas de disputa e visibilidade do rural brasileiro”. gt 20 – Metamorfose do Rural Contemporâneo. 36º Encontro Anual da Anpocs. cds/unb, Set/2010, http://portal.anpocs.org/portal/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=8072&Itemid=217.
Singer, A. (2009), “Raízes sociais e ideológicas do lulismo”. Novos Estudos Cebrap [on-line], 85:83-102. Disponível em http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-33002009000300004&lng=en&nrm=iso.
Souza, H. G. (2013), Contra-hegemonia: um conceito de Gramsci? Belo Horizonte, dissertação de mestrado, Faculdade de Educação da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
Staggenborg, S. (2013), “Institutionalization of social movements”. In: Snow, David A. et al. The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements. Oxford, Blackwell.
Suh, D. (2011), “Institutionalizing social movements: the dual strategy of the Korean women’s movement”. The Sociological Quarterly, 52: 442-471.
Tarrow, S. (2009), O poder em movimento: movimentos sociais e confronto político. Petrópolis, Vozes.
Tecchio, A. (2012), Políticas públicas de desenvolvimento territorial e a superação da pobreza no meio rural brasileiro: estudo de caso no Território Meio Oeste Contestado (sc). Florianópolis, dissertação de mestrado, Programa de Pós-graduação em Agroecossistemas da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, https://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/handle/123456789/99407.
Tilly, C. (1992), “How to detect, describe, and explain repertoires of contention”. Center for Studies of Social Change Working Paper Series, 150, 6.
______. (2007), Democracy. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Touraine, A. (jun.1989), “Os novos conflitos sociais: para evitar mal-entendidos”. Lua Nova, 17: 5-18. Disponível em http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-64451989000200002&lng=es&nrm=iso.
______. (1992), “Beyond social movements”. Theory, Culture, and Society, 9: 125-145.
Truman, D. (1951), The governmental process: political interests and public opinion. New York, Alfred A. Knopf.
Trumpy, A. J. (2008), “Subject to negotiation: the mechanisms behind co-optation and corporate reform”. Social Problems, 55, 480-500.
Veiga, J. E. da (2001a), “O Brasil rural ainda não encontrou seu eixo de desenvolvimento”. Estudos Avançados, 15 (43): 101-119.
______. (2001b), “Desenvolvimento territorial: do entulho varguista ao zoneamento ecológico-econômico”. Bahia Análise & Dados, 10 (4): 193-206.
______. (2002), “A face territorial do desenvolvimento”. Interações, 3 (5): 5-19.
______. (2006), “Nascimento de outra ruralidade”. Estudos Avançados, 20 (57): 333-353. Disponível em http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-40142006000200023&lng=en&nrm=iso.
Veltz, Pierre (2002), Des lieux et des liens: politiques du territoire à l’heure de la mondialisation. Paris, Editions de l’Aube.
Williams, Raymond (1977), Marxism and literature. London, New Left Books.
Wolford, Wendy. (2010a), “Participatory democracy by default: Land reform, social movements and the state in Brazil”. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37 (1): 91-109.
______. (2010b), This land is ours now: social mobilization and the meanings of land in Brazil. Durham/London, Duke University Press.
Zimmermann, S. et al. (2014), “Desenvolvimento territorial e políticas de enfrentamento da pobreza rural no Brasil”. Campo: Território, 9: 540-573.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2017 Tempo Social
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
