EXPRESSIVE VOCABULARY OF CHILDREN FROM TWENTY-TWO TO THIRTY-SIX MONTHS OF AGE: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.39691Keywords:
language assessment, expressive vocabulary, LDS, screening.Abstract
This study aimed at describing lhe vocabulary of children from twenty-two to thirtysix months of age, inserted into lhe child care program of the Health Center of Vila Mariana - São Paulo. We interviewed lhe mothers of 30 children, 17 (57°^Ó) mate and 13 (43%) female; 15 were between 22 and 28 months of age and 15 were between 29 and 36 months of age. We used lhe Expressive VocabularyAssessmer^ltChecklist (CAPOVILLA & CAPOVILLA, 1997). We calculated the descriptive measures and used ANO^VA for the statistical treatment. The results showed that children around two years of aKe speak an average of ! 95 words. The girls spoke 43 words more than the boys and two words more per sentence. We verified that as age increased, the number of words used and the number of words per sentence also increased in both sexes. The categories that were most spoken by the children were names of people, body parts, actions,house and objects. We concluded that it is possible to characterize children’s vocabulary and to detect children with utterance delay through the parents’ information.
References
American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4ª edition. Washington, DC: 1994.
Aram DM, Ekelman BL, Nation JE. Preschoolers with language disorders: 10 years later. J. Speech Hear Res. 1984;27:232-244.
Bates E, Marchman V, Thal D, Fenson L, Dale RS, Reznick JS. et al. Developmental and stylistic variation in the composition of early vocabulary. J. Child Lang. 1994;21:85-123.
Bax M, Hart H, Jenkins S. Assessment of speech and language development in the young child. Pediatrichcs. 1980;66(3): 35()-354.
Bee H. A criança em desenvolvirmento. 7ª ed. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas, 1996.
Befi-L opes DM, Galea DES. Análise do desempenho lexical em crianças com alterações no desenvolvimento da linguagem. Pró-Fono. 2000; 12 (2): 31-37.
Capovilla FC, Capovilla AGS. Desenvolvimento lingüistico na criança dos dois aos seis anos: tradução e estandardização do peabody picture vocabulary test de Dunn & Dunn, e da language development survey de Rescorla. Ciência Cognitiva. Teoria, Pesquisa e Aplicação. 1997;1(1):353-380.
Dale P. The validity of a parent report measure of vocabulary and syntax at 24 months. J Spe-ech Hear Res. 1991;34:565-571.
De Andraca I, Pino P, La Parra A, Rivera F, Castillo M. Factores de riesgo para el desarrollo psicomotor en lactantes nacidos en óptimas condiciones biológicas. Rev Saúde Pública. 1998; 32(2): 138-147.
Dutra MDS, Dan IB, Almeida LMS, Pedromônico MRM. Linguagem expressiva: estudo em crianças entre 22 e 35meses. In: Anais. São Paulo: 17° Encontro Intemacional de Audiologia: 2002. p.97.
Glasco EFP. Can clinical judgment detect children with speech-language problems? Pediaitrics. 1991;87(3):317-321.
Glasgoe FR, Altemeier WA, Macle-An WE. The importance of parents’ concerns about their child’s development. AJDC. 1989;143:955-958.
Glascoe FP, Dworkin RH. The role of parents in the detection of developmental and behavioral problems. Pediatrics. 1995;95(ó):829-X36.
Law J. Identificação precoce dos distúrbios da linguagem na criança. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter, 2001. p.21-41.
Alvarez MAS, Moraes MC, Rabi-Novich EP. Rev Bras Cresc Desenv Hum. 1998;8(1/2):70-74.
Pedromônico MRM, Azevedo MF, Kopeiman BI. Recém-nascidos pré-termo internados em unidade de terapia intensiva: desenvolvimento da conduta interativa no primeiro ano de vida. J Pedriatr. 199;74(4):284-290.
Pereira MR, Perissinoto J, Chiari BM. Bebê pré-termo: algumas considerações sobre o desenvolvimento da linguagem à partir da observação fonoaudiológica. Pró-Fono. 1993;5(2): 29-32.
Ramey CT, Ramey SL. Prevention of intellectual disabilities: early interventions to improve cognitive development. Prev Med. 1993;27:224-232.
Rescoria L. The language development survey: a screening tool for delayed language in toddlers. J Speech Hear Disord. 1999;54:587-599.
Reznick JS, Goldfield BA. Diary vs. representative checklist assessment of productive vocabulary. J. Child Lang. 1994;21:465-472.
Roberts JE, Burchina LM, Du-Rham M. Parent’s report of vocabulary and grammatical development of african American preescholers: child and environmental associations. Child Dev. 1999;70(1):92-106.
Rutter M, Sroufe LA. Development child Psychopathology. Concepts And Challenges. Development and Psychopathology. 2000;12:265-296.
Sameroff AJ, Seifer R,Barocas R, Zax M, Greenspan S. Intelligence quotient scores of 4-year-old children: social-en-vironmental risk factors. Pediatrics. 1987;79(3):343-350.
UNICEF. Situação da Infância Brasileira 2001[online]. UNICEF; 2001. Disponível em: http:// www.ünicef.org/brazil/sib200 1 /index.htm
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis